Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 20, 2016·Gila River Arena, Glendale

St. Louis Blues 6, Arizona Coyotes 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 84% of the time.

ARI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL414012214640
ARI1711025422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:23ARIShane DoanAssists: Brad Richardson, Michael Stone · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 1:08STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 4:22STLAlexander SteenAssists: David Backes, Joel Edmundson · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P1 7:49STLJaden SchwartzAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–1
  5. P1 10:06STLCarl GunnarssonAssists: Robby Fabbri, Troy Brouwer · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–1
  6. P2 9:21ARIKevin ConnautonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–2
  7. P3 0:50ARIMax DomiAssists: Kevin Connauton · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:18STLPatrik BerglundGWGAssists: Scottie Upshall, Colton Parayko · Tip-in, 0.22 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:26ARIMax DomiAssists: Kevin Connauton, Michael Stone · Wrist, 0.15 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:59STLDavid BackesENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.55 xG6–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:42ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:47STLJori Lehtera: Holding2 min
  3. P2 7:01STLJoel Edmundson: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 11:04ARIShane Doan: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 11:04STLJoel Edmundson: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 11:04ARIShane Doan: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 17:01ARIZbynek Michalek: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
47% to win54% to win
← STL attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Steen won the faceoff against Richardson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLARI
40Shots on goal22
4.0Expected goals1.8
77Shot attempts49
37Faceoffs won23
3Power plays2
9Penalty minutes11
24Hits22
11Blocked shots17
1Giveaways9
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz12:04

    xG 0.51–0.12 (81%)attempts 14–3goals 1–0

  2. Upshall – Backes – Berglund2:31

    xG 0.28–0.06 (83%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Upshall – Brodziak – Reaves4:35

    xG 0.20–0.10 (67%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Brouwer – Stastny – Fabbri7:52

    xG 0.41–0.34 (55%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGunnarsson – Parayko14:49

    xG 0.78–0.27 (74%)attempts 19–11goals 2–2

  2. Bortuzzo – Edmundson13:06

    xG 0.62–0.23 (73%)attempts 21–8goals 1–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Shattenkirk15:46

    xG 0.40–0.48 (46%)attempts 18–14goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestDoan – Richardson – Martinook8:43

    xG 0.30–0.13 (69%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Hanzal – Duclair – Domi11:08

    xG 0.42–0.36 (54%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  3. Chipchura – Tikhonov – Gaudet7:14

    xG 0.06–0.07 (46%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Vermette – Boedker – Rieder12:52

    xG 0.36–0.76 (32%)attempts 8–22goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestStone – Connauton12:49

    xG 0.81–0.29 (73%)attempts 16–13goals 2–0

  2. Stone – Dahlbeck8:53

    xG 0.22–0.06 (79%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Michalek – Connauton6:09

    xG 0.02–0.13 (11%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 1.8 xGSTL 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #174 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.40 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 84% of the time.

ARI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).