Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 1, 2016·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 72% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11121408333
MIN31208310630

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:33COLJarome IginlaPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Mikkel Boedker · Slap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:37MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:38MINJason PominvilleAssists: Nino Niederreiter · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:48MINErik HaulaAssists: Mathew Dumba, Marco Scandella · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 3:25COLChris BigrasAssists: Matt Duchene, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:33COLCody McLeodAssists: Jack Skille, John Mitchell · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:34MINCharlie CoyleGWGAssists: Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:33MINCharlie CoyleENAssists: Ryan Suter, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.63 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:16MINNino NiederreiterENAssists: Jason Pominville · Backhand, 0.78 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 0:12MINNino Niederreiter: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 6:57MINThomas Vanek: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 12:51COLShawn Matthias: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 15:22COLJack Skille: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 18:20MINErik Haula: Holding2 min
  6. P2 19:56COLBlake Comeau: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win54% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Haula won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
33Shots on goal30
2.4Expected goals3.8
63Shot attempts52
21Faceoffs won25
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
13Hits17
11Blocked shots19
3Giveaways2
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMitchell – McLeod – Skille9:52

    xG 0.57–0.09 (86%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Comeau – Soderberg – Matthias9:17

    xG 0.56–0.15 (79%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Duchene – Grigorenko11:34

    xG 0.29–0.37 (44%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1

  4. Boedker – Landeskog – MacKinnon11:45

    xG 0.18–0.50 (27%)attempts 9–10goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGelinas – Bigras3:41

    xG 0.11–0.02 (85%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Barrie – Gelinas6:16

    xG 0.10–0.03 (79%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Holden – Barrie7:30

    xG 0.33–0.29 (54%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Haula – Niederreiter10:03

    xG 0.54–0.18 (75%)attempts 8–8goals 3–0

  2. Koivu – Parise – Coyle12:17

    xG 0.49–0.17 (74%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  3. Vanek – Porter – Granlund9:12

    xG 0.10–0.16 (39%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Carter – Fontaine7:46

    xG 0.02–0.30 (6%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon17:10

    xG 0.42–0.20 (68%)attempts 13–16goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Scandella2:07

    xG 0.05–0.01 (78%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Dumba17:31

    xG 0.61–0.75 (45%)attempts 16–14goals 3–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.8 xGCOL 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #94 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.10 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 72% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).