Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 12, 2016·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Nashville Predators 2, Vancouver Canucks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 61% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH04217016237
VAN2131817428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:44VANSven BaertschiAssists: Ben Hutton, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.39 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:01VANDerek DorsettAssists: Bo Horvat, Alexandre Burrows · Snap, 0.18 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:17NSHMike FisherAssists: Roman Josi, Shea Weber · Snap, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:35VANBo HorvatGWGAssists: Yannick Weber, Alexandre Burrows · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:20NSHColton SissonsAssists: Roman Josi, Austin Watson · Snap, 0.22 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:11VANDaniel SedinENAssists: Henrik Sedin, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.67 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:00NSHFilip Forsberg: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 1:00VANJake Virtanen: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 1:00VANJake Virtanen: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 1:00NSHFilip Forsberg: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 5:12NSHRyan Ellis: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 13:01NSHAustin Watson: Interference2 min
  7. P2 11:40VANDaniel Sedin: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 13:45VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 3:58VANAlexandre Burrows: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 4:19NSHMike Ribeiro: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
47% to win54% to win
← NSH attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Granlund won the faceoff against Fisher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHVAN
37Shots on goal28
2.6Expected goals3.3
59Shot attempts49
29Faceoffs won26
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
18Hits20
13Blocked shots11
4Giveaways4
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Smith – Forsberg10:34

    xG 0.53–0.28 (66%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  2. Wilson – Watson – Sissons4:06

    xG 0.25–0.03 (91%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

  3. Neal – Jarnkrok – Johansen9:06

    xG 0.16–0.25 (38%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Fisher – Salomaki – Arvidsson7:53

    xG 0.34–0.44 (43%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm7:31

    xG 0.51–0.07 (87%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Josi14:59

    xG 0.72–0.79 (48%)attempts 15–14goals 2–2

  3. Ellis – Bitetto9:34

    xG 0.24–0.33 (42%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Granlund – Baertschi9:05

    xG 0.54–0.04 (93%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Vey – Etem – McCann8:44

    xG 0.53–0.19 (73%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Burrows – Dorsett – Horvat10:10

    xG 0.66–0.40 (62%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  4. Etem – Granlund – Baertschi2:10

    xG 0.00–0.38 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Weber15:53

    xG 0.87–0.15 (85%)attempts 12–7goals 2–0

  2. Sbisa – Hutton15:03

    xG 0.77–0.82 (49%)attempts 17–16goals 1–0

  3. Biega – Bartkowski9:55

    xG 0.02–0.23 (9%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.3 xGNSH 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 45/100 · #660 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 61% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).