Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 14, 2016·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Nashville Predators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI2506013224
NSH21111006327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:39CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Ryan Hartman, Marian Hossa · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:46NSHP.K. SubbanPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Filip Forsberg · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:51CHINiklas HjalmarssonAssists: Duncan Keith, Richard Panik · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P1 16:33NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Mike Fisher · Snap, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:36NSHMike FisherPPGWGAssists: Roman Josi, Ryan Johansen · Tip-in, 0.22 xG2–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 6:18CHIBrian Campbell: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:28NSHMike Fisher: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 15:06CHIJonathan Toews: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  4. P1 18:29CHINick Schmaltz: Holding2 min
  5. P2 5:21CHIJordin Tootoo: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 5:21NSHAnthony Bitetto: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 6:04CHIArtem Anisimov: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 10:40CHIJonathan Toews: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 10:40NSHJames Neal: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 16:00CHIArtem Anisimov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  11. P3 0:51NSHCraig Smith: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 11:23NSHColin Wilson: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 11:41CHIBrent Seabrook: Closing hand on puck2 min
  14. P3 13:37NSHP.K. Subban: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 13:37CHIPatrick Kane: Embellishment2 min
  16. P3 18:14NSHP.K. Subban: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
44% to win56% to win
← CHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINSH
24Shots on goal27
1.7Expected goals2.9
55Shot attempts45
28Faceoffs won36
4Power plays6
24Penalty minutes20
11Hits19
8Blocked shots19
5Giveaways7
2Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Kane – Panarin4:09

    xG 0.10–0.01 (95%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Anisimov – Kane – Schmaltz3:16

    xG 0.09–0.02 (80%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Anisimov – Kane – Motte5:13

    xG 0.20–0.21 (49%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Panik – Kruger – Motte3:07

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hjalmarsson – Kempny3:06

    xG 0.05–0.03 (59%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Hjalmarsson10:30

    xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 13–2goals 1–0

  3. Campbell – Forsling12:25

    xG 0.29–0.41 (41%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Smith – Arvidsson8:11

    xG 0.48–0.09 (84%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Fisher – Neal – Wilson9:37

    xG 0.45–0.37 (55%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Johansen – Forsberg – Fiala8:52

    xG 0.32–0.27 (54%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

  4. Jarnkrok – Salomaki – Sissons5:52

    xG 0.03–0.26 (11%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm14:01

    xG 0.72–0.35 (67%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Carle – Subban2:39

    xG 0.24–0.09 (73%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Carle – Bitetto4:33

    xG 0.23–0.19 (55%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.9 xGCHI 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #638 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.41 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).