Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 15, 2016·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Arizona Coyotes 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 74% of the time.

ARI winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI1101111405330
ARI2131701312435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:49ARIShane DoanPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Christian Dvorak · Backhand, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:31PHIMichael RafflAssists: Nick Schultz, Brandon Manning · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:17ARIMartin HanzalAssists: Jakob Chychrun, Max Domi · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–2
  4. P2 0:17ARIBrad RichardsonSHAssists: Jordan Martinook · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–3
  5. P2 6:16PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Claude Giroux, Mark Streit · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:36PHIMatt ReadAssists: Travis Konecny, Brandon Manning · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:12ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonGWGAssists: Martin Hanzal, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.37 xG3–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:35PHINick Cousins: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 2:52PHINick Cousins: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 4:44ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Interference2 min
  4. P1 8:45PHINick Cousins: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:17ARIAnthony Duclair: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 7:07PHIMark Streit: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 0:23PHITravis Konecny: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 1:51ARIShane Doan: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 11:42PHIWayne Simmonds: Elbowing2 min
  10. P3 15:16ARIRadim Vrbata: Tripping2 min
  11. OT 3:12PHIJakub Voracek: Misconduct10 min
  12. OT 3:12PHIJakub Voracek: Game misconduct10 min
  13. OT 3:12PHIJakub Voracek: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
44% to win56% to win
← PHI attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Richardson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIARI
30Shots on goal35
2.8Expected goals4.4
62Shot attempts61
29Faceoffs won23
4Power plays6
34Penalty minutes8
21Hits30
11Blocked shots16
2Giveaways2
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Simmonds – Raffl9:20

    xG 0.76–0.22 (78%)attempts 13–7goals 2–0

  2. Voracek – Couturier – Konecny9:41

    xG 0.34–0.30 (53%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Weise – Cousins – Bellemare4:48

    xG 0.00–0.17 (2%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Gordon – VandeVelde – Read3:15

    xG 0.10–0.50 (16%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStreit – Provorov12:25

    xG 0.73–0.37 (66%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – Manning10:16

    xG 0.49–0.59 (45%)attempts 9–11goals 2–1

  3. MacDonald – Gostisbehere12:57

    xG 0.35–0.48 (42%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Hanzal – Domi10:16

    xG 1.16–0.46 (71%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Rieder – Duclair – Dvorak5:42

    xG 0.15–0.31 (32%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  3. Doan – Richardson – Martinook8:14

    xG 0.22–0.40 (35%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

  4. White – Dauphin – Crouse3:43

    xG 0.04–0.46 (8%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcBain – Chychrun10:20

    xG 0.96–0.33 (74%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Murphy16:48

    xG 0.53–0.43 (55%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Schenn11:14

    xG 0.19–1.03 (15%)attempts 6–13goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 4.4 xGPHI 2.8 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #105 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.27 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 74% of the time.

ARI winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).