Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 17, 2016·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Colorado Avalanche 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
COL2100711311431
PIT2120131600331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:57PITPhil KesselPPAssists: Kris Letang, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:33PITMatt CullenAssists: Chris Kunitz, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.33 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:27COLJarome IginlaPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Tyson Barrie · Snap, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:50COLPatrick WierciochAssists: Rene Bourque, Fedor Tyutin · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:12PITTrevor DaleyPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Justin Schultz · Slap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:28COLGabriel LandeskogPPAssists: Mikhail Grigorenko, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:22COLGabriel LandeskogGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Erik Johnson · Tip-in, 0.15 xG4–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 8:24COLNikita Zadorov: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:24PITOlli Maatta: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 13:20COLCarl Soderberg: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 14:32PITNick Bonino: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 15:21PITChris Kunitz: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 12:24COLPatrick Wiercioch: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 17:31COLJarome Iginla: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 17:31PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 2:59COLRene Bourque: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 3:49PITPhil Kessel: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 4:05PITChris Kunitz: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 8:34COLJoe Colborne: High sticking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 13:10PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
44% to win56% to win
← COL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bonino won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLPIT
31Shots on goal31
3.6Expected goals2.5
57Shot attempts57
24Faceoffs won42
6Power plays5
12Penalty minutes14
42Hits22
13Blocked shots18
3Giveaways7
8Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestBourque – Colborne – Bourque4:20

    xG 0.61–0.01 (99%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Bourque – Colborne – Duchene5:07

    xG 0.09–0.05 (65%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Comeau – Soderberg – Grigorenko2:00

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Comeau – Smith – Martinsen2:06

    xG 0.01–0.07 (15%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Johnson – Barrie2:19

    xG 0.07–0.05 (61%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Beauchemin – Zadorov2:31

    xG 0.01–0.07 (12%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Tyutin – Wiercioch6:54

    xG 0.14–0.23 (38%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Kunitz – Sheary6:04

    xG 1.10–0.04 (97%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  2. Malkin – Hornqvist – Wilson6:37

    xG 0.45–0.14 (76%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  3. Cullen – Hornqvist – Wilson2:09

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  4. Fehr – Sestito – Kuhnhackl3:20

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin17:33

    xG 1.42–0.11 (93%)attempts 22–10goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – Maatta4:10

    xG 0.16–0.01 (95%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Daley – Cole3:35

    xG 0.09–0.03 (73%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.5 xGCOL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #103 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.28 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).