Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 18, 2016·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Arizona Coyotes 4, Ottawa Senators 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 71% of the time.

OTT winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI11601138435
OTT213111418742

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:18ARITobias RiederAssists: Dylan Strome, Connor Murphy · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:41OTTBobby RyanPPAssists: Mike Hoffman, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:16OTTTom PyattAssists: Ryan Dzingel, Marc Methot · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:04OTTZack SmithSHAssists: Tom Pyatt, Cody Ceci · Snap, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:01ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Shane Doan, Alex Goligoski · Slap, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:30OTTChris KellyUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:11OTTMark StoneGWGAssists: Kyle Turris, Mike Hoffman · Wrist, 0.31 xG2–5
  8. P3 10:07ARIJordan MartinookAssists: Alex Goligoski · Snap, 0.07 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:13OTTKyle TurrisAssists: Mike Hoffman, Mark Stone · Snap, 0.08 xG3–6
  10. P3 18:43ARIJordan MartinookAssists: Connor Murphy, Brad Richardson · Tip-in, 0.04 xG4–6
  11. P3 19:47OTTErik KarlssonENAssists: Chris Kelly · Wrist, 0.71 xG4–7
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:50OTTDion Phaneuf: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 13:37ARIRyan White: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:00OTTMark Stone: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 2:00ARIConnor Murphy: Embellishment2 min
  5. P2 12:40OTTChris Neil: Interference2 min
  6. P2 14:05OTTZack Smith: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:05ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 19:15OTTBobby Ryan: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P2 19:54OTTChris Kelly: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 4:28ARIAnthony Duclair: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 12:02OTTCody Ceci: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
44% to win56% to win
← ARI attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hanzal won the faceoff against Kelly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIOTT
35Shots on goal42
3.2Expected goals4.6
70Shot attempts61
35Faceoffs won35
5Power plays2
8Penalty minutes14
20Hits20
9Blocked shots23
13Giveaways16
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRieder – Duclair – Strome4:46

    xG 0.58–0.21 (74%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  2. Vrbata – Hanzal – Domi7:32

    xG 0.39–0.12 (77%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  3. White – Dauphin – Crouse7:12

    xG 0.40–0.43 (48%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  4. Vrbata – Hanzal – Rieder4:20

    xG 0.10–0.18 (36%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ekman-Larsson – Murphy15:41

    xG 0.90–0.89 (50%)attempts 19–15goals 2–2

  2. McBain – Connauton10:07

    xG 0.11–0.62 (15%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Schenn13:43

    xG 0.42–1.44 (23%)attempts 15–16goals 1–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestTurris – Hoffman – Stone11:57

    xG 1.40–0.58 (71%)attempts 20–9goals 2–1

  2. Kelly – Pyatt – Pageau10:03

    xG 0.74–0.32 (70%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  3. Neil – Brassard – Dzingel2:16

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Ryan – Brassard – Smith6:46

    xG 0.42–0.58 (42%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMethot – Karlsson13:00

    xG 1.64–0.26 (86%)attempts 18–10goals 3–0

  2. Borowiecki – Wideman7:42

    xG 0.60–0.09 (87%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Chabot2:46

    xG 0.05–0.09 (34%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 4.6 xGARI 3.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #184 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 40% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 71% of the time.

OTT winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).