Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 18, 2016·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Los Angeles Kings 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK1708215330
MIN25311110626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:50LAKTanner PearsonAssists: Jeff Carter · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:36MINErik HaulaAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:48MINJason PominvilleAssists: Erik Haula · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:38MINCharlie CoylePPAssists: Zach Parise, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.30 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:11MINMikko KoivuGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund, Chris Stewart · Wrist, 0.42 xG1–4
  6. P2 17:08MINTeemu PulkkinenAssists: Jonas Brodin, Zac Dalpe · Deflected, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P3 6:42LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Tom Gilbert, Tyler Toffoli · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–5
  8. P3 14:35LAKTanner PearsonAssists: Jeff Carter, Devin Setoguchi · Slap, 0.18 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:42MINJared SpurgeonENAssists: Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.43 xG3–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 12:31MINChristian Folin: Holding2 min
  2. P1 14:36MINJason Zucker: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 4:05LAKJeff Carter: Holding2 min
  4. P2 8:10MINChris Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 9:21MINZach Parise: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 12:01LAKAnze Kopitar: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 18:04LAKAndy Andreoff: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 0:57LAKNicholas Shore: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 8:37MINZach Parise: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
44% to win56% to win
← LAK attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKMIN
30Shots on goal26
2.1Expected goals2.6
72Shot attempts35
40Faceoffs won37
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
19Hits14
4Blocked shots25
6Giveaways8
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestKopitar – King – Toffoli13:33

    xG 0.78–0.11 (88%)attempts 18–5goals 1–0

  2. Carter – Setoguchi – Pearson10:23

    xG 0.55–0.47 (54%)attempts 9–9goals 2–0

  3. Brown – Lewis – Shore8:20

    xG 0.22–0.18 (55%)attempts 8–4goals 0–2

  4. Nolan – Dowd – Andreoff4:51

    xG 0.04–0.54 (6%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – McNabb13:50

    xG 0.80–0.11 (88%)attempts 23–3goals 1–1

  2. Gilbert – Forbort10:16

    xG 0.46–0.25 (65%)attempts 8–7goals 1–1

  3. Gilbert – McNabb2:04

    xG 0.10–0.22 (32%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Stewart – Granlund10:49

    xG 0.51–0.35 (59%)attempts 4–12goals 1–0

  2. Dalpe – Zucker – Pulkkinen5:27

    xG 0.44–0.41 (51%)attempts 9–5goals 1–1

  3. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter10:46

    xG 0.17–0.28 (38%)attempts 5–9goals 2–0

  4. Staal – Parise – Coyle8:26

    xG 0.19–0.55 (26%)attempts 4–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Suter – Spurgeon14:48

    xG 0.20–0.31 (40%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  2. Brodin – Folin12:00

    xG 0.12–0.30 (29%)attempts 4–14goals 1–0

  3. Scandella – Dumba12:26

    xG 0.92–1.13 (45%)attempts 12–26goals 2–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.6 xGLAK 2.1 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #271 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.84 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).