Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 20, 2016·Centre Bell, Montreal

Arizona Coyotes 2, Montréal Canadiens 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 78% of the time.

MTL winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ARI08211010229
MTL112320111543

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:20MTLAlexei EmelinAssists: Paul Byron, David Desharnais · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:07MTLTorrey MitchellAssists: Nathan Beaulieu, Paul Byron · Slap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:06MTLShea WeberPPGWGAssists: Andrei Markov, Tomas Plekanec · Slap, 0.03 xG0–3
  4. P2 5:49MTLAlex GalchenyukAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–4
  5. P2 6:36ARIJakob ChychrunAssists: Jordan Martinook, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:09ARILaurent DauphinSHAssists: Brad Richardson · Backhand, 0.24 xG2–4
  7. P3 12:38MTLArtturi LehkonenAssists: Tomas Plekanec, Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 7:58ARIJordan Martinook: Holding2 min
  2. P1 18:03MTLAlexander Radulov: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P2 0:13ARIMax Domi: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 0:35MTLAlex Galchenyuk: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 3:05ARIRyan White: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 3:05MTLAlexei Emelin: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 3:05ARIRyan White: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:23ARIJordan Martinook: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
44% to win56% to win
← ARI attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Plekanec won the faceoff against Hanzal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIMTL
29Shots on goal43
2.1Expected goals3.9
58Shot attempts77
33Faceoffs won28
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
43Hits24
17Blocked shots19
11Giveaways12
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestDoan – Rieder – Dvorak2:55

    xG 0.16–0.01 (92%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Richardson – White – Dauphin8:26

    xG 0.42–0.31 (57%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Vrbata – Martinook – Strome2:54

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Vrbata – Martinook – Dvorak9:03

    xG 0.44–0.67 (40%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcBain – Ekman-Larsson2:19

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Schenn3:14

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Chychrun3:37

    xG 0.06–0.18 (26%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPacioretty – Gallagher – Galchenyuk11:19

    xG 1.45–0.32 (82%)attempts 20–11goals 1–0

  2. Plekanec – Radulov – Lehkonen11:27

    xG 0.78–0.50 (61%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. Mitchell – Danault – Flynn10:03

    xG 0.35–0.11 (76%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  4. Desharnais – Byron – Shaw9:46

    xG 0.17–0.59 (22%)attempts 10–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMarkov – Petry15:31

    xG 1.93–0.14 (93%)attempts 26–11goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Emelin2:26

    xG 0.19–0.03 (85%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  3. Emelin – Petry2:39

    xG 0.01–0.02 (19%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 3.9 xGARI 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #420 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.66 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 78% of the time.

MTL winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).