Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 22, 2016·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Colorado Avalanche 2, Florida Panthers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 77% of the time.

FLA winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11101017228
FLA01321738538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:38COLBlake ComeauPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Matt Duchene · Slap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:30FLAAaron EkbladPPAssists: Jaromir Jagr, Jonathan Marchessault · Slap, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:02FLAShane HarperAssists: Greg McKegg, Derek MacKenzie · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P3 4:30FLAJonathan MarchessaultGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:21FLAShane HarperAssists: Alexander Petrovic · Slap, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 5:37COLMatt DucheneAssists: Patrick Wiercioch, Carl Soderberg · Tip-in, 0.19 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:56FLAVincent TrocheckUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:20FLAJason Demers: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:40COLAndreas Martinsen: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:43COLBlake Comeau: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 0:58COLJarome Iginla: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 8:32FLADenis Malgin: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 19:23COLNikita Zadorov: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 8:39COLAndreas Martinsen: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 15:13FLAVincent Trocheck: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 17:38COLPatrick Wiercioch: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 17:38FLAShane Harper: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 18:37COLEric Gelinas: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
44% to win56% to win
← COL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Trocheck won the faceoff against Soderberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLFLA
28Shots on goal38
1.4Expected goals3.0
36Shot attempts58
32Faceoffs won33
3Power plays6
17Penalty minutes11
21Hits16
8Blocked shots4
12Giveaways7
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Iginla – Landeskog – MacKinnon10:44

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 0–2

  2. Soderberg – Duchene – Grigorenko11:06

    xG 0.49–0.61 (45%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  3. McLeod – Smith – Bourque5:28

    xG 0.11–0.28 (28%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Comeau – Colborne – Martinsen6:57

    xG 0.18–0.59 (24%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Wiercioch3:21

    xG 0.23–0.06 (79%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Zadorov5:44

    xG 0.09–0.11 (46%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  3. Johnson – Barrie5:41

    xG 0.26–0.30 (47%)attempts 6–5goals 0–2

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestJagr – Marchessault – Barkov10:00

    xG 0.85–0.36 (70%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. MacKenzie – Harper – McKegg8:37

    xG 0.53–0.44 (55%)attempts 9–8goals 2–1

  3. Smith – Trocheck – Rau13:09

    xG 0.19–0.28 (41%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  4. Sceviour – McCann – Malgin7:09

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDemers – Matheson14:24

    xG 1.40–0.12 (92%)attempts 19–6goals 2–0

  2. Petrovic – Pysyk13:15

    xG 0.28–0.24 (54%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  3. Yandle – Ekblad14:21

    xG 0.43–0.81 (34%)attempts 15–17goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.0 xGCOL 1.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLACOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #538 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.04 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 77% of the time.

FLA winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).