Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 6, 2016·Honda Center, Anaheim

Calgary Flames 1, Anaheim Ducks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY11201004126
ANA192715421

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:29ANAClayton StonerAssists: Corey Perry, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:15CGYAlex ChiassonAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Sean Monahan · Tip-in, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:18ANARyan KeslerPPGWGAssists: Corey Perry, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:54ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Josh Manson · Tip-in, 0.23 xG1–3
  5. P3 13:29ANARyan KeslerPPAssists: Corey Perry, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–4
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 4:28ANAAntoine Vermette: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 6:48CGYDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:48ANAJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:23CGYMikael Backlund: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 16:23ANAAntoine Vermette: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 18:00ANAKorbinian Holzer: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 2:52CGYDougie Hamilton: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P2 8:45CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 8:45ANAJoseph Cramarossa: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 16:38CGYMikael Backlund: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 16:38ANARyan Garbutt: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 19:26CGYBrett Kulak: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 13:04CGYMark Giordano: Slashing2 min · PPG
  14. P3 19:13CGYSam Bennett: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 19:13ANARyan Kesler: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
44% to win56% to win
← CGY attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYANA
26Shots on goal21
1.5Expected goals2.0
52Shot attempts39
25Faceoffs won29
2Power plays3
22Penalty minutes20
25Hits23
9Blocked shots15
3Giveaways7
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestChiasson – Gaudreau – Monahan11:52

    xG 0.59–0.29 (67%)attempts 12–4goals 1–1

  2. Stajan – Hamilton – Ferland5:42

    xG 0.11–0.05 (70%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Stajan – Hamilton – Shinkaruk4:23

    xG 0.13–0.08 (63%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Brouwer – Ferland – Bennett2:55

    xG 0.00–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Brodie18:22

    xG 0.41–0.20 (68%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Engelland – Kulak10:05

    xG 0.27–0.17 (61%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  3. Hamilton – Kulak2:44

    xG 0.07–0.24 (22%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Ritchie10:36

    xG 0.47–0.08 (86%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg11:44

    xG 0.50–0.34 (59%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  3. Boll – Wagner – Garbutt5:46

    xG 0.10–0.15 (39%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  4. Vermette – Cramarossa – Rakell8:58

    xG 0.10–0.25 (28%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFowler – Manson12:25

    xG 0.68–0.11 (86%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Stoner – Vatanen14:32

    xG 0.44–0.17 (71%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Holzer14:07

    xG 0.20–0.74 (21%)attempts 5–19goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.0 xGCGY 1.5 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 27/100 · #859 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.88 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).