Thu, Nov 17, 2016·Rogers Arena, Vancouver
Arizona Coyotes 2, Vancouver Canucks 3 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 64% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | 011 | 216 | 07 | 02 | 236 |
| VAN | 013 | 214 | 013 | 12 | 342 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 1:22ARIBrad RichardsonAssists: Shane Doan, Jakob Chychrun · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
- P2 10:45ARITony DeAngeloPPAssists: Martin Hanzal, Max Domi · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–0
- P2 15:45VANBrandon SutterAssists: Daniel Sedin, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
- P2 17:58VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
- OT 2:34VANBen HuttonGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.31 xG2–3
Penalties (5)
- P1 12:43ARIBrad Richardson: Interference2 min
- P2 9:41VANBo Horvat: Holding2 min · PPG
- P2 17:00ARIMichael Stone: Interference2 min · PPG
- P2 19:35VANDaniel Sedin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
- OT 2:34ARIDylan Strome: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Hanzal won the faceoff against Horvat
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- McGinn – Duclair – Strome11:33
xG 0.54–0.56 (49%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0
- Doan – Martinook – Dauphin5:17
xG 0.06–0.09 (38%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Vrbata – Hanzal – Domi14:42
xG 0.53–0.58 (48%)attempts 15–23goals 0–1
- Doan – Richardson – Dauphin7:40
xG 0.21–0.31 (41%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestGoligoski – DeAngelo13:42
xG 0.55–0.41 (57%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0
- Goligoski – Stone3:30
xG 0.07–0.13 (35%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Stone – Chychrun15:34
xG 0.32–0.57 (36%)attempts 14–15goals 0–0
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestSedin – Sedin – Sutter15:42
xG 0.61–0.24 (71%)attempts 19–10goals 1–0
- Eriksson – Chaput – Granlund4:54
xG 0.24–0.03 (90%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0
- Burrows – Baertschi – Horvat14:21
xG 0.64–0.50 (56%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0
- Skille – Chaput – Gaunce2:56
xG 0.01–0.06 (21%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGudbranson – Hutton17:53
xG 0.60–0.34 (64%)attempts 21–13goals 0–0
- Sbisa – Tryamkin15:06
xG 0.62–0.52 (54%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0
- Edler – Stecher18:21
xG 0.57–0.53 (52%)attempts 21–17goals 1–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 64% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (VAN − ARI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).