Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 29, 2016·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Minnesota Wild 4, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN114116212442
VAN07216312535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:07MINJason PominvilleAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:24MINJason PominvilleAssists: Erik Haula, Jason Zucker · Slap, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:23VANBrandon SutterPPAssists: Troy Stecher, Henrik Sedin · Deflected, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:22VANBen HuttonPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.38 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:09VANLoui ErikssonAssists: Michael Chaput, Ben Hutton · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 2:08VANBo HorvatAssists: Luca Sbisa, Brandon Sutter · Deflected, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P3 3:20MINJason ZuckerUnassisted · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P3 14:11MINErik HaulaAssists: Ryan Suter, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–4
  9. P3 17:25VANSven BaertschiGWGAssists: Troy Stecher, Alexandre Burrows · Deflected, 0.04 xG4–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 6:10VANTroy Stecher: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 7:51MINMathew Dumba: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:41MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 4:55VANMarkus Granlund: Interference2 min
  5. P3 11:03MINTyler Graovac: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
44% to win56% to win
← MIN attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINVAN
42Shots on goal35
3.0Expected goals3.1
56Shot attempts55
24Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
11Hits23
12Blocked shots9
3Giveaways6
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Haula – Niederreiter8:21

    xG 0.71–0.18 (80%)attempts 13–8goals 2–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund12:19

    xG 0.61–0.23 (73%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  3. Stewart – Graovac – Mitchell6:24

    xG 0.04–0.20 (16%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Parise – Coyle14:06

    xG 0.51–0.70 (42%)attempts 14–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Brodin12:56

    xG 0.78–0.38 (67%)attempts 12–13goals 1–2

  2. Scandella – Dumba3:55

    xG 0.38–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 1–0

  3. Dumba – Olofsson8:24

    xG 0.37–0.24 (61%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurrows – Baertschi – Horvat11:24

    xG 0.45–0.20 (69%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Granlund – Gaunce3:30

    xG 0.04–0.02 (70%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Skille – Gaunce – Megna3:12

    xG 0.12–0.11 (52%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Eriksson – Chaput – Granlund7:17

    xG 0.59–0.66 (47%)attempts 9–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Hutton15:52

    xG 0.96–0.75 (56%)attempts 21–15goals 1–2

  2. Sbisa – Tryamkin2:40

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  3. Sbisa – Stecher14:05

    xG 0.75–0.93 (45%)attempts 15–15goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.1 xGMIN 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #41 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.34 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 52% of the time.

VAN winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).