Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 2, 2016·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Minnesota Wild 2, Calgary Flames 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 53% of the time.

CGY winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN170819011225
CGY2905013042331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:50MINChris StewartAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Ryan Suter · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:26CGYKris VersteegAssists: Jyrki Jokipakka, Sean Monahan · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:33CGYMikael BacklundPPAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Troy Brouwer · Backhand, 0.38 xG1–2
  4. P3 7:40MINMikko KoivuAssists: Jason Zucker, Jared Spurgeon · Slap, 0.11 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Nino Niederreiter stopped
  2. 2. CGY Kris Versteeg scored
  3. 3. MIN Jason Pominville scored
  4. 4. CGY Sean Monahan scored
  5. 5. MIN Charlie Coyle stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 4:47MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 13:23MINErik Haula: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:33MINMikko Koivu: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 19:01CGYMikael Backlund: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 14:15MINChris Stewart: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 14:15CGYFreddie Hamilton: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:15CGYGarnet Hathaway: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:15MINMarco Scandella: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 10:03CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Interference2 min
  10. P3 13:43MINMathew Dumba: Interference2 min
  11. P3 16:43CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 19:58MINJason Zucker: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
44% to win56% to win
← MIN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCGY
25Shots on goal31
2.6Expected goals2.8
46Shot attempts63
36Faceoffs won28
3Power plays5
14Penalty minutes10
14Hits15
20Blocked shots9
10Giveaways8
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Zucker – Granlund11:21

    xG 0.91–0.03 (97%)attempts 14–3goals 1–0

  2. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter12:10

    xG 0.74–0.06 (92%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0

  3. Stewart – Graovac – Gabriel5:23

    xG 0.08–0.02 (78%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Parise – Coyle13:13

    xG 0.07–0.83 (8%)attempts 3–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon15:52

    xG 1.36–0.71 (66%)attempts 17–12goals 2–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba15:51

    xG 0.66–0.35 (65%)attempts 15–13goals 0–1

  3. Scandella – Prosser12:05

    xG 0.25–0.21 (55%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Backlund – Tkachuk12:52

    xG 0.89–0.26 (77%)attempts 22–9goals 0–0

  2. Stajan – Chiasson – Bennett7:59

    xG 0.03–0.20 (12%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1

  3. Hamilton – Ferland – Hathaway7:40

    xG 0.09–0.63 (13%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Versteeg – Brouwer – Monahan9:09

    xG 0.14–0.87 (14%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Hamilton12:45

    xG 0.31–0.07 (82%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  2. Wideman – Brodie15:52

    xG 0.72–0.97 (43%)attempts 14–15goals 0–1

  3. Engelland – Jokipakka14:32

    xG 0.13–0.89 (13%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.8 xGMIN 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #246 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 53% of the time.

CGY winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).