Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 5, 2016·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Ottawa Senators 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT211210113534
PIT221312313846

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:45PITBryan RustAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:18OTTKyle TurrisAssists: Ryan Dzingel, Chris Wideman · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 8:45PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Conor Sheary, Ian Cole · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P1 13:44OTTErik KarlssonAssists: Mark Stone · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 1:00OTTMark StonePPAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Erik Karlsson · Backhand, 0.18 xG3–2
  6. P2 7:08OTTMike HoffmanPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Mark Stone · Snap, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P2 8:28PITMatt CullenSHAssists: Bryan Rust · Backhand, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P2 14:13PITPhil KesselAssists: Justin Schultz, Ian Cole · Snap, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. P2 14:37PITJustin SchultzAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Phil Kessel · Snap, 0.08 xG4–5
  10. P3 1:05PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Phil Kessel · Backhand, 0.07 xG4–6
  11. P3 6:17OTTDion PhaneufPPAssists: Kyle Turris, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.26 xG5–6
  12. P3 12:36PITBryan RustUnassisted · Backhand, 0.31 xG5–7
  13. P3 17:32PITBryan RustENAssists: Chris Kunitz, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.70 xG5–8
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 10:49OTTDerick Brassard: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 15:07OTTMark Borowiecki: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 0:33PITPatric Hornqvist: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:40PITTrevor Daley: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:30PITJustin Schultz: Interference2 min
  6. P2 14:56OTTTom Pyatt: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 2:05OTTDion Phaneuf: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 4:48PITMatt Cullen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 8:34PITPhil Kessel: Holding2 min
  10. P3 12:36OTTChris Wideman: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  11. P3 0:00OTTAndreas Englund: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
44% to win56% to win
← OTT attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Turris won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPIT
34Shots on goal46
3.0Expected goals4.6
62Shot attempts72
29Faceoffs won36
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
51Hits34
17Blocked shots17
6Giveaways7
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Turris – Dzingel – Pageau8:56

    xG 0.39–0.39 (50%)attempts 8–13goals 1–1

  2. Neil – Kelly – Pyatt3:06

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  3. Brassard – Hoffman – Stone14:18

    xG 0.35–0.80 (30%)attempts 17–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhaneuf – Ceci3:53

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Borowiecki – Wideman4:30

    xG 0.19–0.05 (79%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Phaneuf – Wideman4:17

    xG 0.14–0.07 (68%)attempts 3–3goals 1–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Kessel – Hagelin13:11

    xG 0.50–0.19 (73%)attempts 12–11goals 2–0

  2. Crosby – Hornqvist – Sheary11:20

    xG 0.68–0.48 (59%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  3. Kunitz – Bonino – Rust7:57

    xG 0.22–0.04 (85%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Fehr – Wilson6:48

    xG 0.13–0.26 (34%)attempts 2–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Schultz14:12

    xG 0.62–0.05 (92%)attempts 15–7goals 3–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin13:35

    xG 0.94–0.51 (65%)attempts 19–6goals 1–1

  3. Daley – Maatta14:02

    xG 0.64–0.37 (63%)attempts 10–21goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.6 xGOTT 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #27 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.26 · 13 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 75% of the time.

PIT winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).