Tue, Dec 6, 2016·United Center, Chicago
Arizona Coyotes 0, Chicago Blackhawks 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 63% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI | 09 | 06 | 07 | 022 |
| CHI | 15 | 213 | 19 | 427 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 15:37CHIArtem AnisimovPPGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–1
- P2 6:26CHIMarian HossaAssists: Ryan Hartman, Trevor van Riemsdyk · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
- P2 6:45CHIDennis RasmussenAssists: Richard Panik · Wrist, 0.35 xG0–3
- P3 16:44CHIMarian HossaAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson · Slap, 0.22 xG0–4
Penalties (5)
- P1 14:37ARIJamie McGinn: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P2 8:34CHIArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
- P2 0:00CHIRichard Panik: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
- P3 2:46ARIShane Doan: Tripping2 min
- P3 9:51ARIJordan Martinook: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Anisimov won the faceoff against Dvorak
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestHanzal – Rieder – Duclair2:44
xG 0.30–0.06 (85%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Doan – Rieder – Dvorak6:17
xG 0.36–0.13 (74%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Doan – Domi – Dvorak3:18
xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
- Hanzal – Duclair – Domi7:13
xG 0.11–0.25 (30%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGoligoski – Schenn2:24
xG 0.45–0.04 (91%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Schenn – Chychrun11:00
xG 0.58–0.38 (60%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1
- Ekman-Larsson – Murphy15:21
xG 0.58–0.40 (59%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestHossa – Kruger – Hartman12:35
xG 0.73–0.32 (70%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0
- Tootoo – Desjardins – Hinostroza8:03
xG 0.26–0.15 (64%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0
- Panik – Motte – Rasmussen10:40
xG 0.50–0.43 (54%)attempts 4–11goals 1–0
- Anisimov – Kane – Panarin11:29
xG 0.31–0.31 (50%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestvan Riemsdyk – Forsling12:29
xG 0.84–0.39 (69%)attempts 8–10goals 2–0
- Campbell – Hjalmarsson3:15
xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0
- Keith – Hjalmarsson16:34
xG 0.53–0.38 (58%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 63% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CHI − ARI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).