Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 10, 2016·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 57% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT115111211437
TBL182609323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:03PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:57TBLJonathan DrouinPPAssists: Anton Stralman, Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:38TBLValtteri FilppulaAssists: Nikita Nesterov · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:19TBLJonathan DrouinAssists: Jason Garrison, Vladislav Namestnikov · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:25PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:08PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:36PITEvgeni MalkinPPGWGAssists: Trevor Daley, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 4:43TBLNikita Nesterov: Holding2 min
  2. P1 8:52TBLNikita Kucherov: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 8:52PITTrevor Daley: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:07PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:07PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 19:13TBLAlex Killorn: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 1:01PITSidney Crosby: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 15:52TBLAndrej Sustr: Holding2 min · PPG
  9. P3 1:57TBLAlex Killorn: Holding the stick2 min
  10. P3 1:57PITTrevor Daley: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 3:41TBLNikita Nesterov: High sticking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 8:25TBLBraydon Coburn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 8:25PITIan Cole: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 8:25TBLCedric Paquette: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 8:25TBLCedric Paquette: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 19:44PITPatric Hornqvist: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
44% to win56% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
37Shots on goal23
2.1Expected goals1.7
55Shot attempts40
36Faceoffs won32
5Power plays4
20Penalty minutes32
20Hits23
9Blocked shots12
11Giveaways11
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Kessel – Hagelin9:29

    xG 0.50–0.12 (80%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  2. Cullen – Kuhnhackl – Wilson7:55

    xG 0.22–0.13 (62%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Bonino – Rust10:03

    xG 0.16–0.23 (41%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Crosby – Hornqvist – Sheary10:23

    xG 0.41–0.56 (42%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin14:48

    xG 0.87–0.32 (73%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – Maatta2:27

    xG 0.11–0.03 (78%)attempts 5–1goals 0–1

  3. Cole – Schultz10:57

    xG 0.23–0.25 (47%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Namestnikov – Drouin4:13

    xG 0.11–0.01 (89%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  2. Killorn – Drouin – Point8:24

    xG 0.30–0.25 (54%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Palat – Kucherov8:42

    xG 0.29–0.28 (51%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Boyle – Kucherov – Namestnikov2:29

    xG 0.10–0.10 (50%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGarrison – Nesterov7:52

    xG 0.43–0.10 (81%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  2. Garrison – Witkowski3:18

    xG 0.07–0.05 (56%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

  3. Garrison – Sustr3:49

    xG 0.06–0.09 (42%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.7 xGPIT 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #237 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.87 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 57% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).