Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 10, 2017·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 57% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI013013114140
BUF0831316427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:15BUFSam ReinhartPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Ryan O'Reilly · Snap, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:39BUFWilliam CarrierGWGAssists: Taylor Fedun, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.25 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:51BUFEvander KaneAssists: Sam Reinhart, Zach Bogosian · Snap, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P3 17:53PHIBrayden SchennPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:56BUFMarcus FolignoENAssists: Sam Reinhart, Jake McCabe · Wrist, 0.60 xG1–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:28BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 5:28PHIBrandon Manning: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 17:03BUFJustin Falk: Holding2 min
  4. P2 3:57PHIBrayden Schenn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 15:13PHIMichael Del Zotto: Holding2 min
  6. P3 16:32BUFJake McCabe: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
40Shots on goal27
2.9Expected goals3.2
81Shot attempts45
40Faceoffs won24
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
11Hits17
11Blocked shots19
7Giveaways7
3Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Couturier – Konecny13:51

    xG 0.54–0.32 (63%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Giroux – Read – Raffl12:25

    xG 0.50–0.42 (54%)attempts 17–8goals 0–1

  3. VandeVelde – Bellemare – Lyubimov4:51

    xG 0.01–0.01 (46%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Simmonds – Weise – Schenn12:25

    xG 0.46–0.48 (49%)attempts 13–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManning – Gostisbehere13:02

    xG 0.55–0.26 (68%)attempts 20–7goals 0–0

  2. Del Zotto – Gudas17:26

    xG 0.75–0.48 (61%)attempts 21–10goals 0–0

  3. MacDonald – Provorov13:40

    xG 0.23–0.59 (28%)attempts 9–13goals 0–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Bailey – Reinhart7:46

    xG 0.30–0.17 (63%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. Okposo – O'Reilly – Carrier9:42

    xG 0.35–0.29 (54%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  3. Gionta – Foligno – Eichel8:36

    xG 0.05–0.19 (21%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFranson – Bogosian17:13

    xG 0.64–0.47 (58%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  2. Falk – Fedun9:13

    xG 0.33–0.23 (58%)attempts 5–15goals 1–0

  3. McCabe – Ristolainen18:59

    xG 0.29–0.84 (26%)attempts 12–23goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.2 xGPHI 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #926 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.53 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 57% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).