Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 17, 2017·Pepsi Center, Denver

Chicago Blackhawks 6, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 73% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI21114312627
COL1103805423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:38CHINick SchmaltzUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:39COLMatt DuchenePPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Tyson Barrie · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:50CHIBrent SeabrookAssists: Dennis Rasmussen, Nick Schmaltz · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:03COLBlake ComeauAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikhail Grigorenko · Slap, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:06COLMatt NietoAssists: Gabriel Landeskog · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:25CHITanner KeroAssists: Trevor van Riemsdyk, Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. P2 14:08COLMatt DucheneAssists: Tyson Barrie, Francois Beauchemin · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:10CHIVinnie HinostrozaAssists: Brent Seabrook, Michal Kempny · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:11CHIVinnie HinostrozaGWGAssists: Tanner Kero, Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:49CHITanner KeroENAssists: Jonathan Toews, Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.72 xG6–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 6:42CHIRichard Panik: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:31COLMikko Rantanen: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 4:29CHIBrent Seabrook: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 15:34CHIRyan Hartman: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 15:34COLNikita Zadorov: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
44% to win56% to win
← CHI attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Anisimov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICOL
27Shots on goal23
2.6Expected goals1.4
52Shot attempts42
23Faceoffs won37
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
6Hits27
13Blocked shots15
4Giveaways7
10Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Hinostroza – Kero10:44

    xG 0.57–0.09 (86%)attempts 12–9goals 3–0

  2. Desjardins – Rasmussen – Schmaltz8:21

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 9–1goals 2–1

  3. Toews – Panik – Hartman11:16

    xG 0.37–0.24 (61%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  4. Toews – Kane – Panarin3:29

    xG 0.06–0.02 (71%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Kempny15:55

    xG 0.85–0.41 (68%)attempts 19–9goals 3–3

  2. Campbell – van Riemsdyk16:49

    xG 0.46–0.11 (80%)attempts 14–11goals 2–0

  3. Keith – Hjalmarsson16:32

    xG 0.45–0.40 (53%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestDuchene – Nieto – Landeskog10:45

    xG 0.28–0.16 (64%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Comeau – Bourque – MacKinnon3:23

    xG 0.10–0.03 (78%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  3. Mitchell – Colborne – Grigorenko6:08

    xG 0.00–0.23 (0%)attempts 0–8goals 0–2

  4. Bourque – MacKinnon – Rantanen10:53

    xG 0.14–0.39 (27%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Tyutin – Goloubef3:27

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Tyutin – Barrie6:59

    xG 0.11–0.09 (54%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Barrie11:39

    xG 0.32–0.34 (48%)attempts 7–12goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.4 xGCHI 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #35 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.41 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 73% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).