Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 4, 2017·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Arizona Coyotes 3, San Jose Sharks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ARI01011016022328
SJS01318114051240

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 12:23ARIShane DoanPPAssists: Jamie McGinn, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 17:15SJSBrenden DillonAssists: Patrick Marleau, Logan Couture · Backhand, 0.30 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:18SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Patrick Marleau, Mikkel Boedker · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 2:44ARIRyan WhiteUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Patrick Marleau stopped
  2. 2. ARI Brendan Perlini scored
  3. 3. SJS Logan Couture scored
  4. 4. ARI Radim Vrbata scored
  5. 5. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 11:06SJSTomas Hertl: Interference2 min
  2. P1 14:09SJSBrenden Dillon: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:09ARILawson Crouse: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:22ARIShane Doan: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 18:17ARILuke Schenn: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 18:17ARIMike Smith: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 2:34SJSKevin Labanc: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 2:34SJSMicheal Haley: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 2:34ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 10:33SJSMicheal Haley: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  11. P2 14:27SJSBrent Burns: Interference2 min
  12. OT 2:09ARIShane Doan: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
44% to win56% to win
← ARI attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hanzal won the faceoff against Thornton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARISJS
28Shots on goal40
2.5Expected goals3.7
55Shot attempts65
33Faceoffs won25
4Power plays4
15Penalty minutes15
22Hits19
13Blocked shots12
23Giveaways20
6Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. White – Martinook – Crouse9:39

    xG 0.24–0.28 (46%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. McGinn – Burmistrov – Domi7:24

    xG 0.08–0.23 (27%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

  3. Vrbata – Hanzal – Rieder12:17

    xG 0.36–0.59 (38%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  4. Doan – Perlini – Dvorak10:05

    xG 0.19–0.53 (26%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Goligoski – Stone14:14

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Stone – Ekman-Larsson2:24

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Murphy – Chychrun11:18

    xG 0.16–0.53 (23%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Couture – Boedker10:55

    xG 1.27–0.32 (80%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0

  2. Hertl – Labanc – Meier2:06

    xG 0.17–0.02 (88%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Hertl13:04

    xG 0.38–0.28 (57%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  4. Haley – Karlsson – Labanc5:47

    xG 0.15–0.09 (63%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchlemko – Dillon11:52

    xG 1.03–0.21 (83%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Vlasic – Braun15:37

    xG 0.67–0.25 (73%)attempts 17–8goals 0–0

  3. Martin – Burns13:39

    xG 0.55–0.44 (55%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.7 xGARI 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #413 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.84 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).