Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 12, 2017·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Vancouver Canucks 4, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN21121208431
BUF21006012228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:58BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Evan Rodrigues · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:07VANBo HorvatPPAssists: Ben Hutton, Markus Granlund · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:37VANMichael ChaputAssists: Daniel Sedin · Slap, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:44BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:00VANAlexandre BurrowsGWGAssists: Troy Stecher, Bo Horvat · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:33VANMichael ChaputAssists: Alexander Edler, Alexandre Burrows · Slap, 0.13 xG4–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:15BUFRobin Lehner: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:15BUFJustin Falk: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 7:15VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 14:33BUFEvander Kane: Elbowing2 min
  5. P2 7:01BUFTyler Ennis: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 13:31BUFJake McCabe: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 19:02VANAlexander Edler: Holding2 min
  8. P3 4:00BUFKyle Okposo: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 10:03BUFJack Eichel: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 14:36VANLuca Sbisa: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 17:26VANNikita Tryamkin: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← VAN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Sutter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANBUF
31Shots on goal28
3.0Expected goals2.2
51Shot attempts49
25Faceoffs won29
6Power plays3
8Penalty minutes14
12Hits19
13Blocked shots11
6Giveaways7
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurrows – Hansen – Chaput2:03

    xG 0.16–0.03 (84%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  2. Skille – Chaput – Boucher3:57

    xG 0.17–0.09 (66%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Granlund7:26

    xG 0.20–0.17 (54%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Burrows – Hansen – Horvat7:12

    xG 0.41–0.41 (50%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Stecher10:04

    xG 0.62–0.31 (67%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Edler – Tryamkin2:40

    xG 0.02–0.01 (76%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Hutton – Tryamkin8:12

    xG 0.32–0.38 (45%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – O'Reilly – Bailey7:43

    xG 0.35–0.13 (73%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Kane – Reinhart – Eichel8:49

    xG 0.31–0.35 (47%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  3. Gionta – Foligno – Rodrigues3:25

    xG 0.02–0.24 (6%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Ristolainen13:14

    xG 0.91–0.42 (68%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0

  2. Gorges – Kulikov11:24

    xG 0.30–0.20 (60%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Falk – Fedun8:25

    xG 0.31–0.31 (50%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.2 xGVAN 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #618 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 63% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).