Sat, Feb 18, 2017·Gila River Arena, Glendale
San Jose Sharks 4, Arizona Coyotes 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 69% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJS | 29 | 112 | 112 | 433 |
| ARI | 016 | 013 | 18 | 137 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 9:01SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Melker Karlsson · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
- P1 14:26SJSMelker KarlssonGWGAssists: Micheal Haley, Brenden Dillon · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–0
- P2 2:34SJSMicheal HaleyAssists: Paul Martin, Melker Karlsson · Slap, 0.05 xG3–0
- P3 0:33ARIMartin HanzalAssists: Alex Goligoski, Radim Vrbata · Backhand, 0.22 xG3–1
- P3 16:35SJSBrent BurnsPPAssists: Logan Couture, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–1
Penalties (2)
- P2 4:20ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Cross checking2 min
- P3 16:30ARIRadim Vrbata: High sticking2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Couture
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestThornton – Pavelski – Labanc15:02
xG 0.58–0.33 (64%)attempts 13–19goals 0–0
- Marleau – Couture – Boedker13:01
xG 0.75–0.60 (56%)attempts 17–18goals 0–1
- Haley – Tierney – Karlsson13:25
xG 0.38–0.26 (60%)attempts 12–18goals 2–0
- Ward – Hertl – Goldobin10:32
xG 0.20–0.31 (40%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMartin – Burns19:02
xG 0.87–0.34 (72%)attempts 25–21goals 2–0
- Schlemko – Dillon17:08
xG 0.67–0.37 (64%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0
- Vlasic – Braun17:15
xG 0.54–0.68 (44%)attempts 17–29goals 0–1
Arizona Coyotes
Forward lines
- bestVrbata – Hanzal – Rieder5:24
xG 0.46–0.03 (95%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0
- Burmistrov – Rieder – Jooris6:19
xG 0.19–0.14 (58%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1
- McGinn – White – Martinook6:33
xG 0.17–0.21 (46%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1
- White – Burmistrov – Domi4:57
xG 0.02–0.08 (21%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Murphy – Chychrun15:30
xG 0.48–0.46 (51%)attempts 20–13goals 0–2
- Schenn – Ekman-Larsson22:26
xG 0.38–0.71 (35%)attempts 25–25goals 0–1
- Goligoski – Stone15:52
xG 0.57–0.93 (38%)attempts 19–17goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 69% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ARI − SJS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).