Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 26, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Edmonton Oilers 4, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM18310014432
NSH2122818528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:55NSHRyan EllisPPAssists: P.K. Subban, Calle Jarnkrok · Slap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:23EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Patrick Maroon · Snap, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:34NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: James Neal, Ryan Johansen · Snap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:29NSHVernon FiddlerAssists: Roman Josi, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:12EDMMilan LucicPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Oscar Klefbom · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:21NSHColin WilsonAssists: James Neal, Mattias Ekholm · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:25EDMMark LetestuPPAssists: Oscar Klefbom · Slap, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P2 19:00EDMJordan EberleAssists: Andrej Sekera · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. P3 1:19NSHViktor ArvidssonPPGWGAssists: James Neal, Roman Josi · Snap, 0.19 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:14EDMPatrick Maroon: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:23EDMKris Russell: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:51EDMMilan Lucic: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 5:17NSHP.K. Subban: Interference2 min
  5. P2 13:25NSHHarry Zolnierczyk: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:21NSHCraig Smith: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 16:46NSHJames Neal: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 0:14EDMKris Russell: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 19:44EDMPatrick Maroon: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
44% to win56% to win
← EDM attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMNSH
32Shots on goal28
2.1Expected goals2.2
52Shot attempts42
23Faceoffs won43
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
23Hits8
8Blocked shots14
3Giveaways12
6Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Draisaitl – McDavid9:23

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Letestu – Kassian – Caggiula5:40

    xG 0.46–0.27 (63%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Lucic – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins6:53

    xG 0.02–0.08 (23%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Hendricks – Pakarinen – Khaira6:23

    xG 0.09–0.34 (20%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Klefbom8:16

    xG 0.39–0.22 (64%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Sekera – Russell12:52

    xG 0.61–0.51 (54%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Benning – Nurse7:07

    xG 0.05–0.27 (15%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeal – Wilson – Jarnkrok2:51

    xG 0.33–0.02 (94%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Wilson – Jarnkrok – Watson5:25

    xG 0.30–0.04 (89%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Fiddler – Neal – Zolnierczyk5:10

    xG 0.04–0.09 (31%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson8:45

    xG 0.25–0.44 (36%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm10:38

    xG 0.22–0.16 (58%)attempts 5–6goals 1–1

  2. Josi – Ellis9:03

    xG 0.42–0.46 (48%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  3. Weber – Irwin9:19

    xG 0.29–0.53 (36%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.2 xGEDM 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #142 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.85 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).