Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 2, 2017·Madison Square Garden, New York

Philadelphia Flyers 3, New York Rangers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 72% of the time.

NYR winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI091628323
NYR082828424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:33PHIValtteri FilppulaAssists: Jordan Weal · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:57NYRMika ZibanejadPPAssists: Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:10NYRBrendan SmithAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Derek Stepan · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P3 7:01NYROscar LindbergAssists: Dan Girardi, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:10NYRChris KreiderGWGAssists: Derek Stepan, Brady Skjei · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:54PHIBrayden SchennAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere · Slap, 0.02 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:45PHIValtteri FilppulaAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 7:46PHIBrandon Manning: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:00NYRTanner Glass: Charging2 min
  3. P2 3:47PHIValtteri Filppula: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 18:16PHIMichael Del Zotto: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 0:21PHIAndrew MacDonald: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 3:19NYRBrendan Smith: Interference2 min
  7. P3 19:15NYRBrendan Smith: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
44% to win56% to win
← PHI attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Hayes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHINYR
23Shots on goal24
1.9Expected goals3.1
45Shot attempts41
29Faceoffs won20
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
17Hits17
5Blocked shots15
13Giveaways14
5Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. Weise – Schenn – Couturier10:31

    xG 0.11–0.08 (60%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. McDonald – VandeVelde – Bellemare6:13

    xG 0.21–0.24 (47%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal9:57

    xG 0.15–0.47 (24%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Konecny9:57

    xG 0.12–0.89 (12%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Schultz – Gostisbehere10:37

    xG 0.10–0.13 (44%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. MacDonald – Provorov15:12

    xG 0.18–0.67 (21%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  3. Del Zotto – Manning12:36

    xG 0.17–1.16 (13%)attempts 10–11goals 0–2

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestStepan – Kreider – Zuccarello9:24

    xG 0.95–0.14 (87%)attempts 14–4goals 2–0

  2. Nash – Zibanejad – Miller8:50

    xG 0.41–0.17 (70%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Grabner – Hayes – Vesey9:14

    xG 0.40–0.32 (55%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

  4. Glass – Lindberg – Fast9:55

    xG 0.02–0.03 (42%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirardi – Skjei15:11

    xG 1.46–0.45 (76%)attempts 16–10goals 2–0

  2. Smith – Holden13:56

    xG 0.52–0.10 (84%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  3. Klein – Staal14:51

    xG 0.27–0.25 (52%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.1 xGPHI 1.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #341 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.03 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 72% of the time.

NYR winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).