Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 8, 2017·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Toronto Maple Leafs 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 85% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT141816318
TOR1919312530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:11PITPhil KesselAssists: Matt Cullen, Tom Kuhnhackl · Snap, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:40TORJames van RiemsdykAssists: Tyler Bozak, Roman Polak · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:30TORTyler BozakPPAssists: William Nylander, Jake Gardiner · Snap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:55PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Jake Guentzel, Justin Schultz · Slap, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:51PITJake GuentzelUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:30TORKasperi KapanenAssists: Matt Hunwick, Auston Matthews · Snap, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:12TORConnor BrownGWGAssists: Jake Gardiner, Matt Hunwick · Snap, 0.39 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:56TORAuston MatthewsENUnassisted · Snap, 0.62 xG3–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 16:51PITJosh Archibald: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 2:01PITTom Sestito: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:41TORNikita Zaitsev: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:38TORMatt Hunwick: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 11:32PITMark Streit: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
44% to win56% to win
← PIT attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTOR
18Shots on goal30
2.3Expected goals4.7
47Shot attempts71
27Faceoffs won32
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
32Hits13
20Blocked shots12
20Giveaways14
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Kessel – Kuhnhackl9:58

    xG 0.54–0.38 (59%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  2. Porter – Sestito – Simon6:48

    xG 0.11–0.19 (37%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Crosby – Guentzel – Sheary12:08

    xG 0.36–0.67 (35%)attempts 8–15goals 1–0

  4. Wilson – Archibald – Rowney12:42

    xG 0.23–0.84 (22%)attempts 7–20goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Streit – Hainsey2:52

    xG 0.08–0.08 (52%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Streit – Schultz3:34

    xG 0.24–0.25 (49%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Streit – Gaunce3:52

    xG 0.16–0.19 (46%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Nylander – Matthews10:56

    xG 0.91–0.21 (81%)attempts 20–6goals 0–1

  2. Komarov – Kadri – Brown8:51

    xG 0.90–0.26 (77%)attempts 13–6goals 1–1

  3. van Riemsdyk – Bozak – Marner13:50

    xG 0.57–0.38 (60%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  4. Boyle – Martin – Kapanen7:46

    xG 0.13–0.11 (52%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Hunwick11:11

    xG 1.03–0.36 (74%)attempts 20–7goals 1–0

  2. Hunwick – Gardiner2:29

    xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  3. Hunwick – Zaitsev2:15

    xG 0.38–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 4.7 xGPIT 2.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #119 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 85% of the time.

TOR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).