Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 7, 2017·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Nashville Predators 0, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

PIT winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH0709010026
PIT21119114434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:06PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Phil Kessel, Carl Hagelin · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:57PITJake GuentzelAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.33 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:52PITRyan ReavesAssists: Olli Maatta, Carter Rowney · Tip-in, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P3 0:33PITOlli MaattaAssists: Sidney Crosby, Bryan Rust · Slap, 0.03 xG0–4
Penalties (23)
  1. P1 4:21NSHScott Hartnell: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 13:16PITBrian Dumoulin: Holding2 min
  3. P2 3:22PITRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 3:22NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 12:59PITPhil Kessel: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 18:27NSHYannick Weber: Holding2 min
  7. P3 2:49PITRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 2:49NSHCody McLeod: Interference2 min
  9. P3 2:49NSHCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 2:49NSHCody McLeod: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 3:22PITSidney Crosby: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  12. P3 6:20NSHMiikka Salomaki: Holding2 min
  13. P3 6:23PITJake Guentzel: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 6:23PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 6:23NSHViktor Arvidsson: Slashing2 min
  16. P3 12:27NSHScott Hartnell: High sticking2 min
  17. P3 12:27NSHScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  18. P3 12:27NSHScott Hartnell: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 12:27PITRyan Reaves: Roughing2 min
  20. P3 12:27PITRyan Reaves: Roughing2 min
  21. P3 12:27PITRyan Reaves: Misconduct10 min
  22. P3 13:25PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing2 min
  23. P3 18:41NSHRyan Johansen: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Bonino
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHPIT
26Shots on goal34
2.3Expected goals2.9
55Shot attempts49
38Faceoffs won27
5Power plays5
46Penalty minutes36
33Hits25
8Blocked shots14
2Giveaways3
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Jarnkrok – Aberg8:41

    xG 0.28–0.15 (65%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  2. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson7:25

    xG 0.18–0.08 (70%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  3. McLeod – Watson – Salomaki4:05

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Smith – Sissons6:05

    xG 0.51–0.94 (35%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Irwin12:35

    xG 0.58–0.27 (68%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

  2. Weber – Bitetto12:10

    xG 0.47–0.53 (47%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Subban – Ekholm14:39

    xG 0.30–0.93 (24%)attempts 11–13goals 0–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Guentzel10:32

    xG 0.94–0.18 (84%)attempts 9–6goals 2–0

  2. Reaves – Kuhnhackl – Rowney4:37

    xG 0.32–0.10 (77%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. McKegg – Wilson – Sheary7:39

    xG 0.31–0.24 (57%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Kessel – Hagelin10:15

    xG 0.23–0.73 (24%)attempts 10–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Dumoulin4:55

    xG 0.87–0.02 (98%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Maatta2:21

    xG 0.26–0.06 (82%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  3. Schultz – Maatta6:40

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.9 xGNSH 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1234 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.52 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

PIT winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).