Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 10, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Philadelphia Flyers 5, Nashville Predators 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 75% of the time.

NSH winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI0931526530
NSH1928314631

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:17NSHCraig SmithPPAssists: Kevin Fiala, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:08NSHScott HartnellAssists: Pontus Aberg · Slap, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:11NSHNick BoninoAssists: Mattias Ekholm, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.32 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:19PHIAndrew MacDonaldAssists: Scott Laughton, Taylor Leier · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 10:35PHINolan PatrickAssists: Dale Weise · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:05PHIValtteri FilppulaPPAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.45 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:03PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Jordan Weal, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–3
  8. P3 6:48PHIValtteri FilppulaPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakub Voracek · Snap, 0.11 xG5–3
  9. P3 7:38NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Ryan Johansen, Samuel Girard · Snap, 0.07 xG5–4
  10. P3 18:43NSHScott HartnellPPAssists: Filip Forsberg, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.25 xG5–5
  11. P3 19:24NSHFilip ForsbergPPGWGAssists: P.K. Subban, Kevin Fiala · Wrist, 0.16 xG5–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:57PHIClaude Giroux: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:20NSHCraig Smith: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:49PHITravis Konecny: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 3:49NSHSamuel Girard: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 7:32NSHYannick Weber: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 12:23NSHP.K. Subban: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 14:38NSHP.K. Subban: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  8. P3 6:18NSHScott Hartnell: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 17:19PHIDale Weise: Holding2 min · PPG
  10. P3 17:19PHIAndrew MacDonald: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 18:43PHIMichael Raffl: Delaying game bench2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHINSH
30Shots on goal31
2.3Expected goals3.8
48Shot attempts62
28Faceoffs won44
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
13Hits16
14Blocked shots13
9Giveaways8
6Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal10:47

    xG 0.38–0.36 (52%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  2. Weise – Konecny – Patrick10:36

    xG 0.24–0.45 (35%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  3. Laughton – Leier – Raffl8:34

    xG 0.06–0.45 (12%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Couturier10:09

    xG 0.34–0.88 (28%)attempts 7–18goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Gudas – Sanheim9:49

    xG 0.29–0.36 (45%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  2. MacDonald – Provorov14:08

    xG 0.40–0.72 (35%)attempts 11–20goals 0–1

  3. Gostisbehere – Hagg15:59

    xG 0.44–1.06 (29%)attempts 10–19goals 1–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Bonino – Aberg9:12

    xG 0.74–0.15 (83%)attempts 15–5goals 1–0

  2. McLeod – Watson – Salomaki5:40

    xG 0.50–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson5:25

    xG 0.24–0.12 (67%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  4. Jarnkrok – Forsberg – Fiala5:44

    xG 0.03–0.09 (26%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEmelin – Subban15:01

    xG 1.20–0.45 (73%)attempts 20–11goals 0–1

  2. Ekholm – Girard16:28

    xG 0.55–0.33 (62%)attempts 17–11goals 1–2

  3. Weber – Irwin11:14

    xG 0.45–0.31 (59%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.8 xGPHI 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #3 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.73 · 11 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +52 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 75% of the time.

NSH winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).