Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 12, 2017·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT112216112440
TBL21631206534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:07TBLSlater KoekkoekAssists: Chris Kunitz, Anton Stralman · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:46PITJake GuentzelAssists: Kris Letang, Bryan Rust · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:59TBLVictor HedmanPPAssists: Alex Killorn, Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:49TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Alex Killorn · Snap, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:58PITConor ShearyAssists: Chad Ruhwedel, Antti Niemi · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P2 9:49TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Braydon Coburn, Alex Killorn · Snap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P2 14:24PITBryan RustPPAssists: Jake Guentzel, Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–4
  8. P2 17:55TBLSlater KoekkoekGWGAssists: Alex Killorn, Tyler Johnson · Backhand, 0.08 xG3–5
  9. P3 10:01PITMatt HunwickAssists: Greg McKegg, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 11:42TBLDan Girardi: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 14:07PITRyan Reaves: Holding2 min
  3. P1 18:39PITKris Letang: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  4. P2 3:37PITCarter Rowney: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 6:05TBLBraydon Coburn: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 10:06PITCarl Hagelin: Interference2 min
  7. P2 12:55TBLGabriel Dumont: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 15:45TBLSlater Koekkoek: Interference2 min
  9. P3 2:14TBLTyler Johnson: Interference2 min
  10. P3 19:02PITPhil Kessel: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
40Shots on goal34
3.4Expected goals3.1
65Shot attempts63
36Faceoffs won36
5Power plays5
10Penalty minutes10
16Hits24
16Blocked shots10
11Giveaways6
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – McKegg – Sheary4:32

    xG 0.35–0.18 (66%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. McKegg – Rust – Guentzel3:33

    xG 0.19–0.16 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  3. Malkin – Kessel – Hagelin6:33

    xG 0.04–0.10 (31%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

  4. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel7:40

    xG 0.24–0.31 (44%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunwick – Ruhwedel4:01

    xG 0.72–0.11 (87%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin14:31

    xG 0.50–0.48 (51%)attempts 17–10goals 0–0

  3. Maatta – Ruhwedel4:54

    xG 0.07–0.17 (30%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Namestnikov11:13

    xG 0.79–0.21 (79%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  2. Palat – Gourde – Point10:22

    xG 0.52–0.39 (57%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Callahan – Dumont8:06

    xG 0.25–0.36 (41%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  4. Killorn – Johnson – Kucherov2:56

    xG 0.13–0.53 (20%)attempts 2–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Dotchin15:13

    xG 0.91–0.44 (67%)attempts 21–13goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Girardi11:10

    xG 0.23–0.30 (44%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – Koekkoek6:15

    xG 0.25–0.42 (37%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.1 xGPIT 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #268 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).