Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 21, 2017·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, Tampa Bay Lightning 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT07012110129
TBL31331613732

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:36TBLNikita KucherovPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:16TBLSteven StamkosPPGWGAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:59TBLYanni GourdeAssists: Braydon Coburn, Brayden Point · Backhand, 0.27 xG0–3
  4. P2 0:30TBLBrayden PointAssists: Ondrej Palat, Yanni Gourde · Wrist, 0.27 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:58TBLAnton StralmanAssists: Mikhail Sergachev · Snap, 0.05 xG0–5
  6. P2 7:12TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Steven Stamkos, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–6
  7. P3 10:32TBLMikhail SergachevPPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Vladislav Namestnikov · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–7
  8. P3 18:18PITJake GuentzelPPAssists: Bryan Rust, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–7
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 0:57PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 1:36PITSidney Crosby: Misconduct10 min
  3. P1 4:11TBLOndrej Palat: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 13:23PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 1:26PITGreg McKegg: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 12:44TBLBraydon Coburn: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 13:27PITPhil Kessel: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 9:07PITPatric Hornqvist: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 11:27TBLRyan Callahan: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 16:36TBLYanni Gourde: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  11. P3 19:37TBLJake Dotchin: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 19:37PITRyan Reaves: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
29Shots on goal32
1.9Expected goals3.3
58Shot attempts61
43Faceoffs won32
4Power plays5
22Penalty minutes10
18Hits15
19Blocked shots16
6Giveaways6
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Sheary7:00

    xG 0.30–0.02 (93%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Kessel – Hagelin – Guentzel4:51

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Reaves – McKegg – Kuhnhackl5:53

    xG 0.07–0.15 (34%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Hornqvist – Kuhnhackl3:25

    xG 0.22–0.49 (30%)attempts 3–5goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Ruhwedel11:33

    xG 0.33–0.15 (69%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Maatta15:54

    xG 0.92–1.11 (45%)attempts 15–19goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Dumoulin14:43

    xG 0.21–0.91 (19%)attempts 12–15goals 0–2

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestPalat – Gourde – Point12:26

    xG 0.90–0.42 (68%)attempts 9–15goals 2–0

  2. Kunitz – Callahan – Dumont11:29

    xG 0.55–0.13 (81%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Johnson – Point2:18

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  4. Stamkos – Kucherov – Namestnikov11:01

    xG 0.22–0.44 (33%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Dotchin6:55

    xG 1.05–0.10 (91%)attempts 13–2goals 2–0

  2. Girardi – Sergachev3:04

    xG 0.23–0.04 (86%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Coburn – Girardi4:50

    xG 0.34–0.16 (68%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.3 xGPIT 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1108 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.51 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).