Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 30, 2017·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Arizona Coyotes 4, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 68% of the time.

PHI winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ARI213091715434
PHI0301031701331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:20ARIJordan MartinookAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson, Brad Richardson · Snap, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:46ARIChristian DvorakAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Jason Demers · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P3 1:34ARIBrendan PerliniPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Snap, 0.05 xG3–0
  4. P3 2:14PHISean CouturierPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Ivan Provorov · Snap, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 19:07PHIJordan WealAssists: Ivan Provorov, Valtteri Filppula · Snap, 0.35 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:45PHISean CouturierAssists: Claude Giroux, Ivan Provorov · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:45ARIAlex GoligoskiGWGAssists: Clayton Keller, Max Domi · Snap, 0.20 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 12:18ARIChristian Dvorak: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 12:18PHISean Couturier: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 19:55PHIWayne Simmonds: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 1:46ARIBrad Richardson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 10:15PHIJakub Voracek: High sticking double minor4 min
  6. P3 10:15ARILuke Schenn: Roughing2 min
  7. OT 0:32PHIJakub Voracek: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Cousins
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIPHI
34Shots on goal31
3.5Expected goals2.3
59Shot attempts60
31Faceoffs won41
3Power plays1
6Penalty minutes10
34Hits26
12Blocked shots16
15Giveaways14
7Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestStepan – Domi – Keller12:40

    xG 1.23–0.33 (79%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0

  2. Richardson – Martinook – Fischer11:47

    xG 0.50–0.23 (69%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  3. Rieder – Perlini – Dvorak11:26

    xG 0.26–0.22 (54%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  4. Kempe – Rinaldo – Cousins6:41

    xG 0.08–0.31 (21%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDemers – Ekman-Larsson17:36

    xG 1.26–0.19 (87%)attempts 17–10goals 1–0

  2. Goligoski – Hjalmarsson18:30

    xG 0.68–0.39 (63%)attempts 16–16goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Connauton11:41

    xG 0.08–0.68 (11%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Read – Konecny6:50

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Filppula – Simmonds – Konecny4:26

    xG 0.06–0.05 (57%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal7:11

    xG 0.28–0.31 (47%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Couturier15:25

    xG 0.46–0.75 (38%)attempts 18–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Provorov4:03

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Gudas – Sanheim14:16

    xG 0.44–0.42 (51%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  3. Alt – Provorov2:15

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.3 xGARI 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #160 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.83 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +53 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 68% of the time.

PHI winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).