Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 14, 2017·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF2132130600432
PIT11521611311545

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:45BUFEvander KaneAssists: Jack Eichel, Sam Reinhart · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:53BUFSam ReinhartPPAssists: Marco Scandella, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:41PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Riley Sheahan · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:16BUFJack EichelUnassisted · Backhand, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 4:28PITConor ShearyAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:15PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P2 19:53BUFBenoit PouliotPPAssists: Sam Reinhart · Backhand, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 13:49PITPhil KesselAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Ian Cole · Snap, 0.11 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:16PITConor ShearyGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:55BUFKyle Okposo: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 14:19PITIan Cole: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:19BUFJack Eichel: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 14:19BUFEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 15:58PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 8:56BUFMatt Moulson: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 10:05BUFBenoit Pouliot: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 10:21BUFMarco Scandella: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 10:21PITPatric Hornqvist: Interference2 min
  10. P2 13:17PITKris Letang: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 16:21BUFNick Baptiste: Slashing2 min · PPG
  12. P2 18:38PITRyan Reaves: Elbowing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
32Shots on goal45
3.0Expected goals4.0
45Shot attempts81
26Faceoffs won41
3Power plays5
14Penalty minutes10
28Hits35
20Blocked shots4
9Giveaways5
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Pouliot – Okposo – O'Reilly10:14

    xG 0.34–0.29 (53%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

  2. Pominville – Moulson – Larsson7:15

    xG 0.19–0.20 (49%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

  3. Nolan – Girgensons – Baptiste4:59

    xG 0.05–0.20 (19%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  4. Kane – Reinhart – Eichel13:38

    xG 0.32–1.03 (24%)attempts 8–23goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Beaulieu11:56

    xG 0.51–0.33 (60%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  2. Scandella – Beaulieu2:44

    xG 0.14–0.19 (43%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Falk – McCabe2:17

    xG 0.03–0.16 (17%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Sheahan – Sheary8:32

    xG 0.47–0.10 (82%)attempts 12–2goals 2–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel13:10

    xG 0.66–0.33 (67%)attempts 20–9goals 0–1

  3. Reaves – McKegg – Kuhnhackl7:23

    xG 0.09–0.14 (39%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Malkin – Kessel – Hagelin9:42

    xG 0.46–0.64 (42%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin16:50

    xG 1.20–0.37 (76%)attempts 25–8goals 1–1

  2. Maatta – Ruhwedel12:12

    xG 0.44–0.18 (70%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0

  3. Cole – Schultz12:19

    xG 0.49–0.66 (43%)attempts 16–11goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.0 xGBUF 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #38 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.65 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).