Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 2, 2017·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 74% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF05013115133
PIT11021029529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:44PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Jake Guentzel, Olli Maatta · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:36PITCarl HagelinGWGAssists: Bryan Rust, Riley Sheahan · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:00PITPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.27 xG0–3
  4. P3 11:18BUFJason PominvilleAssists: Jack Eichel, Evander Kane · Snap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 13:14PITPhil KesselAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 18:58PITSidney CrosbyENAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.72 xG1–5
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:09BUFSam Reinhart: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:45BUFHudson Fasching: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 10:06BUFZach Bogosian: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:06PITRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 12:24BUFJohan Larsson: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 15:27PITRyan Reaves: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 7:09PITConor Sheary: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P2 15:15PITBrian Dumoulin: Interference2 min
  9. P2 17:37PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 17:37BUFBenoit Pouliot: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. P2 18:11BUFKyle Criscuolo: Holding2 min
  12. P2 19:17BUFMarco Scandella: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  13. P3 2:42PITOlli Maatta: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 7:09BUFJordan Nolan: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
33Shots on goal29
2.6Expected goals4.0
63Shot attempts54
29Faceoffs won32
4Power plays6
19Penalty minutes15
33Hits21
14Blocked shots16
4Giveaways9
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Nolan – Criscuolo5:26

    xG 0.41–0.10 (81%)attempts 9–2goals 0–1

  2. Larsson – Girgensons – Fasching5:05

    xG 0.11–0.18 (38%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Pouliot – O'Reilly – Reinhart9:15

    xG 0.11–0.21 (34%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  4. Pominville – Kane – Eichel10:10

    xG 0.28–0.50 (36%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Bogosian – McCabe7:48

    xG 0.16–0.18 (47%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Ristolainen12:10

    xG 0.48–0.60 (45%)attempts 17–10goals 0–0

  3. Gorges – Beaulieu6:04

    xG 0.07–0.22 (23%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Kessel – Guentzel10:01

    xG 0.63–0.20 (76%)attempts 11–7goals 2–1

  2. Crosby – Hornqvist – Sheary8:43

    xG 0.35–0.09 (79%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  3. Hagelin – Sheahan – Rust6:31

    xG 0.22–0.22 (50%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  4. Reaves – Kuhnhackl – Rowney4:53

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunwick – Maatta7:42

    xG 0.35–0.23 (60%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Cole2:06

    xG 0.12–0.04 (76%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Schultz8:45

    xG 0.33–0.29 (53%)attempts 4–7goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.0 xGBUF 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #954 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 74% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).