Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 5, 2017·Pepsi Center, Denver

Buffalo Sabres 4, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF09212214435
COL010116111237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:32BUFBenoit PouliotSHAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 12:22COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Alexander Kerfoot, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 18:59BUFJake McCabeAssists: Benoit Pouliot, Johan Larsson · Slap, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P3 9:58COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Alexander Kerfoot · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:54BUFEvander KaneGWGAssists: Jack Eichel, Jake McCabe · Wrap-around, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:27BUFJack EichelENAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.72 xG4–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:06BUFJack Eichel: Holding2 min
  2. P1 11:18COLNikita Zadorov: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:29BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 5:10BUFZach Bogosian: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 10:37BUFSam Reinhart: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:51COLMikko Rantanen: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 18:59COLSven Andrighetto: Delaying game bench2 min
  8. P3 8:23BUFKyle Okposo: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 10:43BUFZach Bogosian: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 10:43COLBlake Comeau: Embellishment2 min
  11. P3 12:14BUFMarco Scandella: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCOL
35Shots on goal37
3.9Expected goals3.2
63Shot attempts75
33Faceoffs won29
3Power plays6
14Penalty minutes8
21Hits20
22Blocked shots15
3Giveaways5
9Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Kane – Eichel9:03

    xG 0.76–0.09 (89%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Okposo – Wilson – Rodrigues5:25

    xG 0.33–0.07 (83%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Pouliot – O'Reilly – Fasching5:23

    xG 0.30–0.19 (61%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Nolan – Larsson – Reinhart5:52

    xG 0.07–0.26 (21%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – McCabe11:07

    xG 0.90–0.14 (86%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Ristolainen13:31

    xG 0.88–0.26 (77%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  3. Falk – Antipin8:40

    xG 0.20–0.54 (27%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCompher – MacKinnon – Rantanen7:47

    xG 0.21–0.07 (74%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  2. Wilson – Grimaldi – Andrighetto2:52

    xG 0.07–0.03 (72%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Yakupov – Kerfoot – Jost3:46

    xG 0.08–0.24 (24%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  4. Comeau – Soderberg – Nieto5:15

    xG 0.10–0.28 (27%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Lindholm2:07

    xG 0.23–0.03 (89%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Girard7:33

    xG 0.26–0.12 (68%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  3. Siemens – Lindholm4:55

    xG 0.09–0.25 (28%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.2 xGBUF 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #283 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.13 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 59% of the time.

COL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).