Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 2, 2018·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 1, Colorado Avalanche 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN0911409132
COL21141015726

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:42COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Samuel Girard · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:08COLNathan MacKinnonPPGWGAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Tyson Barrie · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:54COLTyson BarrieAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P2 8:08COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Samuel Girard, Patrik Nemeth · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–4
  5. P2 10:39COLCarl SoderbergAssists: Gabriel Bourque · Backhand, 0.02 xG0–5
  6. P2 12:40COLMikko RantanenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Patrik Nemeth · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–6
  7. P2 17:07MINMikko KoivuAssists: Zach Parise, Mikael Granlund · Snap, 0.05 xG1–6
  8. P3 7:46COLMatt NietoAssists: Blake Comeau, Nathan MacKinnon · Snap, 0.18 xG1–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 10:56MINEric Staal: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:09COLGabriel Bourque: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:20MINRyan Suter: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 3:18COLDominic Toninato: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 8:08MINNino Niederreiter: Delaying game bench2 min
  6. P3 15:53COLBlake Comeau: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
32Shots on goal26
1.9Expected goals2.0
62Shot attempts52
31Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
17Hits25
15Blocked shots16
3Giveaways1
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Winnik – Coyle8:01

    xG 0.41–0.17 (71%)attempts 12–3goals 0–1

  2. Niederreiter – Eriksson Ek – Kunin2:33

    xG 0.21–0.09 (70%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  3. Koivu – Parise – Niederreiter4:28

    xG 0.05–0.04 (54%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Zucker – Granlund12:26

    xG 0.45–0.45 (50%)attempts 12–13goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon12:11

    xG 0.53–0.38 (59%)attempts 20–9goals 0–2

  2. Seeler – Dumba12:51

    xG 0.28–0.27 (51%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1

  3. Suter – Dumba3:25

    xG 0.10–0.13 (44%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:14

    xG 0.53–0.29 (64%)attempts 16–12goals 4–0

  2. Comeau – Soderberg – Nieto8:41

    xG 0.20–0.05 (79%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Kerfoot – Compher – Jost3:18

    xG 0.04–0.02 (67%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Bourque – Toninato – Compher4:47

    xG 0.03–0.15 (16%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNemeth – Girard14:21

    xG 0.85–0.24 (78%)attempts 16–9goals 4–0

  2. Barrie – Zadorov17:28

    xG 0.53–0.63 (46%)attempts 18–20goals 1–0

  3. Siemens – Lindholm11:16

    xG 0.19–0.40 (32%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.0 xGMIN 1.9 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1105 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.51 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).