Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 5, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Arizona Coyotes 3, Edmonton Oilers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ARI11301221000335
EDM3170501311436

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:29ARIJason DemersAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Derek Stepan · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:01EDMJujhar KhairaSHAssists: Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:21EDMMilan LucicAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Matt Benning · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:04EDMJesse PuljujarviPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P3 11:31ARIChristian DvorakAssists: Richard Panik · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:21ARINiklas HjalmarssonUnassisted · Snap, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:50EDMOscar KlefbomGWGAssists: Connor McDavid, Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:35EDMAnton Slepyshev: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:39ARINiklas Hjalmarsson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:11ARINick Cousins: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 10:11EDMDrake Caggiula: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 10:11ARIMax Domi: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 10:11EDMDrake Caggiula: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 10:11ARIMax Domi: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 10:59EDMRyan Strome: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 15:02ARIJason Demers: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 6:40ARIJordan Martinook: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 12:30EDMMichael Cammalleri: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richardson won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIEDM
35Shots on goal36
3.3Expected goals3.5
62Shot attempts61
28Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
12Penalty minutes10
30Hits33
18Blocked shots15
9Giveaways17
6Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Cousins – Martinook10:06

    xG 1.46–0.10 (94%)attempts 20–7goals 1–1

  2. Panik – Hamilton – Archibald5:51

    xG 0.37–0.08 (82%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Panik – Domi – Dvorak2:41

    xG 0.21–0.08 (71%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  4. Domi – Dvorak – Fischer9:35

    xG 0.41–0.34 (55%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHjalmarsson – Connauton11:08

    xG 1.17–0.29 (80%)attempts 20–10goals 2–0

  2. Demers – Ekman-Larsson14:01

    xG 0.94–0.52 (64%)attempts 16–9goals 1–1

  3. Schenn – Connauton3:19

    xG 0.29–0.13 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Draisaitl – McDavid12:10

    xG 0.71–0.60 (54%)attempts 13–14goals 1–1

  2. Cammalleri – Nugent-Hopkins – Aberg10:04

    xG 0.47–0.41 (54%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

  3. Pakarinen – Khaira – Caggiula7:30

    xG 0.07–0.10 (40%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Strome – Slepyshev – Puljujarvi8:02

    xG 0.03–1.05 (3%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Nurse – Bear2:10

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  2. Sekera – Benning9:37

    xG 0.19–0.63 (23%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Russell – Nurse15:38

    xG 0.41–1.16 (26%)attempts 11–25goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.5 xGARI 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #314 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).