Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 25, 2018·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI21411811300445
PIT162141814532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:03PHITravis SanheimAssists: Jordan Weal, Wayne Simmonds · Snap, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:38PITDerick BrassardAssists: Conor Sheary, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:07PHIBrandon ManningAssists: Jordan Weal, Valtteri Filppula · Slap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 0:37PITPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–2
  5. P2 2:37PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Justin Schultz, Brian Dumoulin · Snap, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:10PHIJordan WealPPAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Oskar Lindblom · Snap, 0.35 xG3–3
  7. P3 0:17PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Justin Schultz, Jake Guentzel · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:17PHISean CouturierAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.37 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:25PITBryan RustGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.38 xG4–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 15:09PITBrian Dumoulin: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 17:25PHISean Couturier: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 19:48PHIJakub Voracek: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:40PITDerick Brassard: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 17:28PITBrian Dumoulin: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
45Shots on goal32
3.0Expected goals3.1
59Shot attempts52
34Faceoffs won22
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
21Hits19
10Blocked shots9
4Giveaways10
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Lindblom – Patrick12:09

    xG 0.47–0.37 (56%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Giroux – Couturier – Konecny13:12

    xG 0.52–0.52 (50%)attempts 16–11goals 0–1

  3. Lehtera – Read – Laughton4:56

    xG 0.08–0.14 (37%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal10:54

    xG 0.23–0.45 (34%)attempts 10–9goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManning – Gudas14:28

    xG 0.75–0.51 (59%)attempts 18–11goals 1–0

  2. Gostisbehere – Provorov14:20

    xG 0.53–0.61 (47%)attempts 16–14goals 0–2

  3. MacDonald – Sanheim13:57

    xG 0.19–0.65 (23%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Guentzel8:43

    xG 0.65–0.09 (88%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Brassard – Kessel – Sheary9:45

    xG 0.36–0.10 (78%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Malkin – Hornqvist – Hagelin8:09

    xG 0.37–0.40 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  4. Sheahan – Kuhnhackl – Simon5:55

    xG 0.02–0.08 (16%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Oleksiak14:44

    xG 0.58–0.25 (70%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Dumoulin16:04

    xG 0.85–0.59 (59%)attempts 13–16goals 2–1

  3. Maatta – Ruhwedel13:16

    xG 0.32–0.54 (37%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.1 xGPHI 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #62 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.63 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).