Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 4, 2018·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 1, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 74% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN150808121
COL11411828440

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:14MINZach PariseAssists: Mikko Koivu, Nino Niederreiter · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:29COLCarl SoderbergAssists: Matt Nieto · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:26COLNathan MacKinnonGWGAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Patrik Nemeth · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:07COLMikko RantanenENAssists: Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.70 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:40COLJ.T. CompherENAssists: Alexander Kerfoot, Carl Soderberg · Wrist, 0.76 xG1–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 9:51COLTyson Jost: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P1 9:51MINGreg Pateryn: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:14MINMathew Dumba: Holding the stick2 min
  4. P2 1:03COLSheldon Dries: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 5:49COLIan Cole: Interference2 min
  6. P2 5:49MINEric Staal: Holding2 min
  7. P2 6:38MINRyan Suter: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 16:50COLTyson Barrie: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 2:13COLAlexander Kerfoot: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 18:07MINJordan Greenway: Delaying game bench2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
21Shots on goal40
2.7Expected goals4.2
49Shot attempts65
33Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
10Penalty minutes10
26Hits20
13Blocked shots17
2Giveaways5
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHendricks – Fehr – Foligno6:36

    xG 0.42–0.15 (74%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Parise – Granlund4:11

    xG 0.14–0.11 (55%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Zucker – Niederreiter5:18

    xG 0.07–0.13 (34%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Koivu – Parise – Niederreiter7:56

    xG 0.35–0.46 (44%)attempts 4–6goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Brodin14:19

    xG 0.54–0.44 (55%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Pateryn – Seeler11:06

    xG 0.31–0.39 (45%)attempts 7–14goals 1–1

  3. Suter – Dumba16:32

    xG 0.55–0.67 (45%)attempts 13–20goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen14:17

    xG 0.73–0.37 (66%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  2. Calvert – Compher – Dries4:21

    xG 0.40–0.10 (79%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Soderberg – Bourque – Nieto8:36

    xG 0.30–0.20 (59%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  4. Wilson – Kerfoot – Jost7:11

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNemeth – Zadorov12:39

    xG 0.42–0.09 (83%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Girard11:58

    xG 0.58–0.46 (56%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  3. Barrie – Girard2:24

    xG 0.12–0.02 (87%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.2 xGMIN 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 31/100 · #833 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.05 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 74% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).