Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 10, 2018·Honda Center, Anaheim

Arizona Coyotes 3, Anaheim Ducks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 74% of the time.

ANA winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ARI116110012011339
ANA1131605010225

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:52ANARyan KeslerAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Hampus Lindholm · Tip-in, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:33ARIDylan StromePPAssists: Clayton Keller, Richard Panik · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:24ARIBrad RichardsonSHAssists: Michael Grabner, Niklas Hjalmarsson · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:39ANABen StreetAssists: Marcus Pettersson · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Rickard Rakell stopped
  2. 2. ARI Nick Cousins scored
  3. 3. ANA Troy Terry stopped
  4. 4. ARI Clayton Keller stopped
  5. 5. ANA Jakob Silfverberg stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 1:44ANAAdam Henrique: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:19ANAAndrej Sustr: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 3:54ARIDerek Stepan: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 12:19ARIClayton Keller: Interference2 min
  5. P3 8:25ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 10:13ARIBrendan Perlini: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richardson won the faceoff against Lundeström
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIANA
39Shots on goal25
3.8Expected goals2.3
75Shot attempts48
28Faceoffs won24
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
17Hits27
13Blocked shots19
13Giveaways17
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Grabner – Cousins10:45

    xG 0.88–0.06 (93%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Kempe – Strome – Crouse4:40

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Fischer – Strome – Keller5:19

    xG 0.12–0.21 (37%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  4. Stepan – Panik – Hinostroza13:34

    xG 0.77–0.91 (46%)attempts 17–18goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Lyubushkin14:39

    xG 0.79–0.40 (66%)attempts 18–9goals 0–1

  2. Hjalmarsson – Connauton14:22

    xG 0.82–0.47 (64%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Demers – Ekman-Larsson15:15

    xG 0.53–0.80 (40%)attempts 20–14goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKesler – Cogliano – Sherwood5:37

    xG 0.85–0.27 (76%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Henrique – Silfverberg – Comtois9:20

    xG 0.67–0.37 (64%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Street – Rowney – Lundeström6:59

    xG 0.13–0.13 (50%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Cogliano – Rowney4:22

    xG 0.04–0.14 (23%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLindholm – Montour17:04

    xG 1.06–0.39 (73%)attempts 22–11goals 1–0

  2. Fowler – Manson16:14

    xG 0.65–0.93 (41%)attempts 9–25goals 0–0

  3. Sustr – Pettersson10:44

    xG 0.21–0.82 (20%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.3 xGARI 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #648 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.62 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 74% of the time.

ANA winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).