Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 13, 2018·United Center, Chicago

St. Louis Blues 3, Chicago Blackhawks 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 74% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL01011221204338
CHI2230161615450

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:51CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Brandon Saad, Dominik Kahun · Snap, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:01CHIPatrick KanePPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:35STLBrayden SchennAssists: Jordan Schmaltz, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:44STLDavid PerronPPUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:47STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:06CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:51CHIAlex DeBrincatGWGAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Artem Anisimov · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:51STLJay Bouwmeester: Interference2 min
  2. P1 13:04STLJoel Edmundson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 14:56STLRobert Bortuzzo: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:09CHINick Schmaltz: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 13:51CHIJonathan Toews: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 19:45CHIAlex DeBrincat: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P3 3:49CHIJan Rutta: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Schenn won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCHI
38Shots on goal50
3.3Expected goals5.0
55Shot attempts79
30Faceoffs won31
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
21Hits18
20Blocked shots14
4Giveaways9
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestPerron – Schenn – Blais8:29

    xG 0.39–0.16 (71%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Maroon – O'Reilly – Tarasenko10:13

    xG 0.22–0.75 (22%)attempts 5–19goals 0–1

  3. Steen – Bozak – Kyrou7:24

    xG 0.09–0.94 (8%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Parayko14:24

    xG 0.66–0.46 (59%)attempts 13–18goals 0–0

  2. Bouwmeester – Schmaltz4:06

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Bortuzzo – Schmaltz6:17

    xG 0.19–0.32 (37%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Schmaltz – Fortin13:16

    xG 1.36–0.76 (64%)attempts 19–12goals 0–0

  2. Toews – DeBrincat – Kahun12:36

    xG 0.79–0.43 (65%)attempts 20–12goals 0–0

  3. Kruger – Saad – Kampf5:03

    xG 0.31–0.02 (94%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Kunitz – Anisimov – Hayden7:52

    xG 0.16–0.32 (34%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Gustafsson13:46

    xG 1.14–0.45 (72%)attempts 21–10goals 0–0

  2. Manning – Rutta10:22

    xG 0.40–0.08 (84%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Jokiharju15:08

    xG 1.06–0.77 (58%)attempts 21–17goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 5.0 xGSTL 3.3 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #142 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.25 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 74% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).