Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 5, 2018·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Philadelphia Flyers 5, Arizona Coyotes 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 61% of the time.

ARI winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI28111215534
ARI08113115236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:34PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Sean Couturier, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:10PHIShayne GostisbeherePPAssists: Claude Giroux, Travis Konecny · Slap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 1:14ARIAlex GalchenyukPPAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Clayton Keller · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:05PHISean CouturierGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:35PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Wayne Simmonds · Backhand, 0.12 xG4–1
  6. P3 14:04ARIRichard PanikAssists: Michael Grabner, Kevin Connauton · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:11PHIOskar LindblomENAssists: Nolan Patrick, Jakub Voracek · Backhand, 0.69 xG5–2
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 16:09ARIKevin Connauton: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 18:06ARINiklas Hjalmarsson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:59PHIOskar Lindblom: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 1:34PHIRobert Hagg: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:57ARIAlex Galchenyuk: Holding2 min
  6. P2 10:01PHIScott Laughton: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 10:50PHIChristian Folin: Holding2 min
  8. P3 19:40PHIChristian Folin: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 19:40ARILawson Crouse: Interference2 min
  10. P3 19:40ARILawson Crouse: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 19:40PHIChristian Folin: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 0:00PHIRadko Gudas: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 0:00ARIKevin Connauton: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 0:00ARIKevin Connauton: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 0:00ARIJordan Oesterle: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  16. P3 0:00PHIRadko Gudas: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Richardson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIARI
34Shots on goal36
2.7Expected goals3.4
55Shot attempts76
30Faceoffs won27
3Power plays4
16Penalty minutes16
10Hits17
23Blocked shots17
7Giveaways11
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSimmonds – Weise – Weal10:51

    xG 0.46–0.25 (65%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Giroux – Couturier – Konecny10:06

    xG 0.32–0.21 (61%)attempts 12–8goals 2–0

  3. Lehtera – Laughton – Aube-Kubel3:25

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Voracek – Lindblom – Patrick9:52

    xG 0.29–0.64 (31%)attempts 7–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Sanheim10:54

    xG 0.35–0.21 (63%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  2. Gudas – Provorov2:31

    xG 0.20–0.12 (63%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Folin13:54

    xG 0.22–0.62 (26%)attempts 9–16goals 1–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestPanik – Galchenyuk – Keller3:53

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Panik – Perlini – Strome3:05

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Grabner – Hinostroza7:20

    xG 0.17–0.12 (59%)attempts 3–8goals 0–2

  4. Stepan – Cousins – Fischer9:28

    xG 0.48–0.45 (52%)attempts 21–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDemers – Ekman-Larsson17:14

    xG 0.98–0.56 (64%)attempts 20–11goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Hjalmarsson5:22

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Hjalmarsson – Connauton4:36

    xG 0.14–0.01 (90%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 3.4 xGPHI 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #615 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 61% of the time.

ARI winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).