Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 19, 2018·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF11021111811540
PIT2152160900440

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:46PITDerick BrassardAssists: Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:43BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Sam Reinhart, Rasmus Ristolainen · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:15PITPhil KesselAssists: Tanner Pearson, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:24PITJake GuentzelAssists: Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:00PITTanner PearsonAssists: Jack Johnson, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.29 xG1–4
  6. P2 10:39BUFZach BogosianAssists: Jeff Skinner, Jack Eichel · Slap, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P2 18:12BUFCasey NelsonAssists: Kyle Okposo, Conor Sheary · Snap, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:12BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Kyle Okposo, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:45BUFJack EichelGWGAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 4:16PITOlli Maatta: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:50BUFJake McCabe: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 16:50BUFJake McCabe: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:50PITRiley Sheahan: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 5:42BUFZach Bogosian: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 7:13BUFMarco Scandella: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 2:44PITDerick Brassard: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 13:40PITChad Ruhwedel: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
40Shots on goal40
3.0Expected goals4.1
65Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
28Hits46
7Blocked shots15
5Giveaways13
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSobotka – Reinhart – Thompson11:29

    xG 0.70–0.02 (98%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Okposo – Sheary – Mittelstadt9:09

    xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 8–5goals 2–1

  3. Berglund – Larsson – Girgensons9:49

    xG 0.39–0.36 (52%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Skinner – Eichel10:53

    xG 0.53–0.53 (50%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Nelson3:00

    xG 0.46–0.14 (77%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Bogosian – Dahlin11:44

    xG 0.90–0.80 (53%)attempts 15–11goals 2–3

  3. Ristolainen – Dahlin4:51

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Brassard – Guentzel11:37

    xG 0.73–0.57 (56%)attempts 11–15goals 2–1

  2. Sheahan – Rust – Aston-Reese8:12

    xG 0.20–0.22 (48%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Kessel – Pearson13:34

    xG 0.67–0.80 (46%)attempts 12–14goals 2–1

  4. Grant – Sprong – Simon8:05

    xG 0.03–0.32 (8%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Maatta10:11

    xG 0.65–0.45 (59%)attempts 9–11goals 2–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin11:33

    xG 0.72–0.60 (54%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

  3. Maatta – Ruhwedel3:14

    xG 0.14–0.13 (52%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 4.1 xGBUF 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #59 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.12 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 67% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).