Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 28, 2018·Pepsi Center, Denver

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

COL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT0521218325
COL182939626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:19COLSamuel GirardAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:13COLErik JohnsonAssists: Sven Andrighetto · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 7:52COLColin WilsonAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Tyson Jost · Snap, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P2 19:08PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Jake Guentzel · Snap, 0.36 xG1–3
  5. P2 19:50PITSidney CrosbyPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:43PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Dominik Simon, Juuso Riikola · Wrist, 0.29 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:05COLGabriel LandeskogGWGAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:31COLNathan MacKinnonENAssists: Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.71 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:44COLCarl SoderbergAssists: Matt Calvert, Matt Nieto · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 0:49PITSidney Crosby: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P2 1:08COLAlexander Kerfoot: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 11:58COLVladislav Kamenev: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 19:45COLPatrik Nemeth: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 7:38COLCarl Soderberg: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCOL
25Shots on goal26
2.1Expected goals1.9
53Shot attempts39
27Faceoffs won30
4Power plays1
2Penalty minutes8
10Hits21
9Blocked shots17
3Giveaways3
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Guentzel – Simon14:12

    xG 1.37–0.28 (83%)attempts 20–8goals 2–2

  2. Grant – Wilson – Sheahan6:49

    xG 0.15–0.17 (47%)attempts 10–6goals 0–1

  3. Malkin – Rust – Pearson11:46

    xG 0.14–0.18 (43%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Kessel – Aston-Reese10:53

    xG 0.09–0.27 (25%)attempts 3–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMaatta – Riikola14:28

    xG 0.73–0.20 (79%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin17:04

    xG 0.87–0.42 (68%)attempts 18–15goals 1–1

  3. Johnson – Oleksiak14:06

    xG 0.02–0.42 (4%)attempts 5–11goals 0–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestAndrighetto – Compher – Kamenev5:59

    xG 0.10–0.00 (98%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Wilson – Kerfoot – Jost8:32

    xG 0.09–0.13 (40%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Soderberg – Calvert – Nieto9:07

    xG 0.26–0.32 (45%)attempts 4–16goals 1–0

  4. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen16:21

    xG 0.38–1.19 (24%)attempts 12–13goals 2–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarberio – Nemeth12:45

    xG 0.27–0.15 (65%)attempts 8–9goals 2–0

  2. Johnson – Girard12:09

    xG 0.35–0.24 (59%)attempts 12–8goals 2–0

  3. Johnson – Cole2:55

    xG 0.04–0.05 (45%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.9 xGPIT 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #118 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 54% of the time.

COL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).