Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 2, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 5, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS2731406527
COL111114210435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:15SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Logan Couture, Brent Burns · Slap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:20COLMatt CalvertAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Matt Nieto · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:14SJSBrent BurnsPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Joe Pavelski · Slap, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:15SJSEvander KaneAssists: Brent Burns, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 6:18SJSJoonas DonskoiAssists: Brent Burns, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrap-around, 0.03 xG4–1
  6. P2 16:33SJSLukas RadilGWGAssists: Joe Pavelski, Logan Couture · Wrist, 0.19 xG5–1
  7. P2 16:49COLTyson JostAssists: J.T. Compher, Alexander Kerfoot · Wrist, 0.12 xG5–2
  8. P3 12:12COLTyson BarrieUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG5–3
  9. P3 16:36COLTyson JostPPAssists: Samuel Girard, Alexander Kerfoot · Tip-in, 0.13 xG5–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 1:07COLTyson Barrie: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:48SJSBarclay Goodrow: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 15:52COLPatrik Nemeth: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:33COLMatt Calvert: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 17:14SJSErik Karlsson: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 0:00SJSBarclay Goodrow: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 14:38SJSBrenden Dillon: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
27Shots on goal35
2.4Expected goals3.0
53Shot attempts57
28Faceoffs won37
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
19Hits21
11Blocked shots16
6Giveaways10
11Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. Kane – Donskoi – Hertl9:10

    xG 0.23–0.24 (49%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Goodrow – Karlsson – Labanc6:21

    xG 0.18–0.27 (40%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Couture – Meier – Radil8:54

    xG 0.26–0.41 (39%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Pavelski – Sorensen8:58

    xG 0.35–0.63 (36%)attempts 6–13goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Ryan6:39

    xG 0.35–0.04 (90%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  2. Burns – Dillon5:06

    xG 0.26–0.13 (67%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Vlasic – Braun3:47

    xG 0.13–0.02 (89%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKerfoot – Compher – Jost5:45

    xG 0.67–0.19 (78%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Soderberg – Calvert – Nieto6:58

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Bourque – Dries – O'Connor2:56

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Bourque – Kerfoot – Compher2:02

    xG 0.11–0.25 (32%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNemeth – Graves4:32

    xG 0.57–0.11 (84%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Nemeth2:12

    xG 0.11–0.02 (86%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Graves2:03

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.0 xGSJS 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #176 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.23 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).