Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 8, 2019·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

New Jersey Devils 1, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD150907121
BUF01151507533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:28NJDBlake ColemanAssists: Miles Wood, Travis Zajac · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:39BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Tage Thompson · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:14BUFC.J. SmithGWGAssists: Johan Larsson, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:42BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Zach Bogosian, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:00BUFJake McCabeSHAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Vladimir Sobotka · Snap, 0.12 xG1–4
  6. P2 17:45BUFLawrence PilutAssists: Conor Sheary, Rasmus Ristolainen · Slap, 0.04 xG1–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:50BUFRasmus Dahlin: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 14:29BUFJeff Skinner: Slashing2 min
  3. P3 3:36BUFCasey Mittelstadt: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 13:05BUFEvan Rodrigues: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 13:05NJDStefan Noesen: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 13:05NJDStefan Noesen: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 17:34BUFLawrence Pilut: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 17:34NJDMiles Wood: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 18:35BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← NJD attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zajac won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDBUF
21Shots on goal33
2.0Expected goals2.7
45Shot attempts65
29Faceoffs won34
4Power plays1
14Penalty minutes20
11Hits13
19Blocked shots11
3Giveaways6
1Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Stafford – Seney4:33

    xG 0.30–0.12 (71%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Boyle – Stafford – Zacha2:18

    xG 0.15–0.02 (90%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Zajac – Coleman – Wood12:28

    xG 0.26–0.56 (32%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  4. Pietila – Noesen – Zacha6:30

    xG 0.03–0.33 (9%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLovejoy – Butcher11:15

    xG 0.40–0.29 (58%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

  2. Vatanen – Severson2:08

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Lovejoy2:29

    xG 0.09–0.19 (32%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Girgensons – Mittelstadt7:47

    xG 0.55–0.25 (69%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Okposo – Larsson – Smith11:12

    xG 0.48–0.26 (65%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  3. Sheary – Reinhart – Rodrigues12:08

    xG 0.57–0.38 (60%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  4. Sobotka – Skinner – Thompson11:17

    xG 0.70–0.65 (52%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Dahlin16:09

    xG 0.87–0.40 (68%)attempts 24–10goals 1–0

  2. Scandella – McCabe14:06

    xG 0.89–0.46 (66%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0

  3. Ristolainen – Pilut13:09

    xG 0.56–0.39 (59%)attempts 15–9goals 3–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.7 xGNJD 2.0 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 28/100 · #880 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.94 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).