Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 14, 2019·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Minnesota Wild 4, Philadelphia Flyers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN212112114438
PHI2143627727

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:34MINJason ZuckerPPAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:26MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Matt Hendricks · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:04PHIJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Jakub Voracek, Sean Couturier · Tip-in, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:48PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Claude Giroux, Radko Gudas · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 2:23MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Eric Staal, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.33 xG3–2
  6. P2 4:59PHINolan PatrickAssists: Scott Laughton, Ivan Provorov · Backhand, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P2 15:28PHINolan PatrickAssists: Travis Sanheim, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P2 19:54PHIWayne SimmondsGWGAssists: Scott Laughton, Nolan Patrick · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–5
  9. P3 8:18MINRyan SuterAssists: Eric Staal, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–5
  10. P3 10:43PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Scott Laughton, Nolan Patrick · Snap, 0.19 xG4–6
  11. P3 18:43PHIJames van RiemsdykENAssists: Claude Giroux, Radko Gudas · Wrist, 0.77 xG4–7
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 6:08PHIWayne Simmonds: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:09MINGreg Pateryn: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:04MINJordan Greenway: Delaying game bench2 min
  4. P1 16:13MINMikael Granlund: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 8:22MINMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:59PHIScott Laughton: Interference2 min
  7. P2 15:59MINDevan Dubnyk: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 6:01PHIClaude Giroux: Holding the stick2 min
  9. P3 12:33MINRyan Suter: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 19:10PHIRobert Hagg: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINPHI
38Shots on goal27
3.6Expected goals2.8
69Shot attempts50
21Faceoffs won38
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
21Hits17
9Blocked shots20
7Giveaways12
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Niederreiter – Greenway7:03

    xG 0.62–0.10 (86%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  2. Hendricks – Foligno – Eriksson Ek5:18

    xG 0.24–0.03 (90%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  3. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund12:09

    xG 0.37–0.26 (58%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Coyle – Kunin7:45

    xG 0.39–0.69 (36%)attempts 13–8goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon17:16

    xG 1.32–0.48 (73%)attempts 23–14goals 0–2

  2. Pateryn – Brodin12:56

    xG 0.87–0.70 (55%)attempts 15–15goals 2–2

  3. Prosser – Seeler8:29

    xG 0.16–0.13 (56%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSimmonds – Laughton – Patrick7:51

    xG 0.47–0.30 (61%)attempts 5–9goals 3–0

  2. Voracek – Couturier – Lindblom9:47

    xG 0.30–0.19 (61%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Lehtera – Varone – Raffl4:49

    xG 0.07–0.06 (54%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  4. Giroux – van Riemsdyk – Konecny10:16

    xG 0.18–1.83 (9%)attempts 6–25goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. MacDonald – Gostisbehere9:17

    xG 0.15–0.41 (27%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

  2. Sanheim – Provorov14:05

    xG 0.29–0.82 (26%)attempts 11–14goals 1–1

  3. Gudas – Hagg12:07

    xG 0.31–1.09 (22%)attempts 8–19goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.8 xGMIN 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #94 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

PHI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).