Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 21, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Nashville Predators 4, Colorado Avalanche 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH0731119427
COL013112011136

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:01NSHNick BoninoAssists: Calle Jarnkrok · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:35NSHViktor ArvidssonGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg · Wrap-around, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:43COLAlexander KerfootAssists: Samuel Girard · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:58NSHRoman JosiAssists: Austin Watson, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 17:07NSHRyan EllisENAssists: Calle Jarnkrok, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.40 xG4–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 1:43NSHColin Blackwell: Elbowing2 min
  2. P1 4:58NSHFrederick Gaudreau: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 11:51COLNikita Zadorov: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 11:51NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:14NSHMattias Ekholm: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 17:14COLMatt Nieto: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P1 19:20COLTyson Barrie: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 1:51COLNikita Zadorov: Kneeing2 min
  9. P2 3:30NSHNick Bonino: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  10. P2 8:12NSHCalle Jarnkrok: Hooking2 min
  11. P2 18:31COLJ.T. Compher: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 7:35NSHAustin Watson: Interference2 min
  13. P3 18:07COLMatt Calvert: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 18:07NSHMatt Irwin: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCOL
27Shots on goal36
2.3Expected goals2.9
40Shot attempts72
25Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
20Penalty minutes18
21Hits25
21Blocked shots8
4Giveaways3
12Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Jarnkrok – Watson6:43

    xG 0.40–0.15 (73%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  2. Grimaldi – Hartman – Gaudreau5:37

    xG 0.14–0.19 (44%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Forsberg – Sissons – Arvidsson9:25

    xG 0.44–0.53 (45%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  4. Smith – Blackwell – Fiala8:48

    xG 0.20–0.38 (35%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm10:35

    xG 0.47–0.19 (72%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

  2. Subban – Josi15:53

    xG 0.92–1.02 (47%)attempts 14–21goals 2–0

  3. Hamhuis – Ekholm3:03

    xG 0.00–0.22 (0%)attempts 0–8goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCalvert – Kerfoot – Andrighetto8:28

    xG 0.45–0.11 (80%)attempts 13–3goals 1–1

  2. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen13:24

    xG 0.69–0.64 (52%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  3. Bourque – Nieto – Dries4:52

    xG 0.14–0.17 (45%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  4. Soderberg – Wilson – Compher10:23

    xG 0.24–0.57 (30%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Nemeth2:38

    xG 0.28–0.05 (85%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Cole – Zadorov3:20

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Barrie3:13

    xG 0.12–0.02 (84%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.9 xGNSH 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 30/100 · #845 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.01 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

COL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).