Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 23, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 5, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN2122818528
COL2110605222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:42COLCarl SoderbergAssists: Colin Wilson, Matt Calvert · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:50MINEric StaalAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:40COLTyson BarriePPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:27MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Ryan Suter, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:24MINEric StaalPPGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund, Pontus Aberg · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:37MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Zach Parise, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 8:13MINRyan SuterPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Pontus Aberg · Slap, 0.12 xG5–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 11:34MINGreg Pateryn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 5:52COLAlexander Kerfoot: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:51COLIan Cole: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:03MINRyan Suter: Interference2 min
  5. P2 12:23COLTyson Barrie: High sticking double minor4 min
  6. P3 6:31COLSven Andrighetto: Delaying game bench face off violation2 min · PPG
  7. P3 7:50COLPatrik Nemeth: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Soderberg won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
28Shots on goal22
2.3Expected goals1.4
60Shot attempts62
29Faceoffs won36
6Power plays2
4Penalty minutes12
28Hits34
24Blocked shots22
1Giveaways4
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Coyle – Greenway10:54

    xG 0.50–0.16 (76%)attempts 7–14goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund11:36

    xG 0.38–0.24 (61%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Eriksson Ek – Kunin8:07

    xG 0.03–0.09 (25%)attempts 3–12goals 0–0

  4. Parise – Rask – Aberg9:20

    xG 0.26–0.61 (30%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon18:23

    xG 0.85–0.49 (63%)attempts 19–17goals 2–0

  2. Pateryn – Seeler4:14

    xG 0.22–0.02 (90%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Pateryn – Brodin10:13

    xG 0.19–0.15 (56%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestCalvert – Kerfoot – Andrighetto6:49

    xG 0.34–0.07 (84%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen14:48

    xG 0.38–0.29 (57%)attempts 23–12goals 0–0

  3. Soderberg – Wilson – Compher10:21

    xG 0.39–0.47 (45%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  4. Bourque – Nieto – Dries5:58

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarrie – Girard3:00

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Nemeth – Graves6:50

    xG 0.31–0.28 (53%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  3. Barrie – Graves3:07

    xG 0.03–0.07 (33%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.4 xGMIN 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 54/100 · #580 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.29 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).