Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 29, 2019·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF31616112534
CBJ113312012437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:14BUFEvan RodriguesAssists: Casey Mittelstadt, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.35 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:17CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Ryan Murray, Cam Atkinson · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 7:59BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jake McCabe · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P1 9:39BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 0:21CBJNick FolignoPPAssists: Artemi Panarin, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–2
  6. P2 0:42BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jack Eichel, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–2
  7. P2 16:52CBJBrandon DubinskyAssists: Scott Harrington, Josh Anderson · Tip-in, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P2 19:27CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Ryan Murray, Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–4
  9. P3 2:12BUFConor ShearyGWGAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.35 xG5–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 10:12CBJArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 18:37BUFConor Sheary: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:18CBJSeth Jones: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:17BUFTage Thompson: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
34Shots on goal37
4.5Expected goals3.1
59Shot attempts66
33Faceoffs won28
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
12Hits28
15Blocked shots13
3Giveaways4
2Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSheary – Rodrigues – Mittelstadt9:27

    xG 1.71–0.42 (80%)attempts 19–10goals 2–1

  2. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel15:19

    xG 1.78–0.57 (76%)attempts 20–13goals 2–0

  3. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons9:51

    xG 0.43–0.53 (45%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Sobotka – Thompson10:32

    xG 0.11–0.30 (27%)attempts 2–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Dahlin14:53

    xG 2.62–0.60 (81%)attempts 29–12goals 4–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen17:09

    xG 0.90–0.62 (59%)attempts 13–20goals 1–1

  3. Hunwick – Scandella13:08

    xG 0.67–0.64 (51%)attempts 11–14goals 0–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Anderson – Bjorkstrand3:50

    xG 0.38–0.13 (74%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Nash – Sedlak – Hannikainen5:06

    xG 0.15–0.06 (71%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg4:35

    xG 0.06–0.10 (38%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Anderson – Wennberg4:21

    xG 0.18–0.23 (44%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Werenski7:31

    xG 0.59–0.28 (68%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  2. Savard – Harrington7:34

    xG 0.26–0.34 (44%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Jones – Werenski11:12

    xG 0.58–0.84 (41%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.1 xGBUF 4.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #130 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.04 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 72% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).