Tue, Feb 12, 2019·KeyBank Center, Buffalo
New York Islanders 1, Buffalo Sabres 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 18 | 07 | 010 | 125 |
| BUF | 15 | 15 | 112 | 322 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 16:25BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jack Eichel · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
- P1 19:37NYICasey CizikasAssists: Matt Martin, Cal Clutterbuck · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1
- P2 6:49BUFJason PominvilleGWGAssists: Jack Eichel · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–2
- P3 17:35BUFJohan LarssonAssists: Kyle Okposo, Zemgus Girgensons · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–3
Penalties (1)
- P2 12:42NYICasey Cizikas: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Cizikas
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New York Islanders
Forward lines
- bestEberle – Lee – Nelson10:38
xG 0.46–0.26 (64%)attempts 13–6goals 0–2
- Bailey – Dal Colle – Barzal10:27
xG 0.57–0.45 (56%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1
- Clutterbuck – Martin – Cizikas10:06
xG 0.22–0.12 (65%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0
- Filppula – Komarov – Beauvillier12:44
xG 0.32–0.22 (59%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestPelech – Pulock17:17
xG 0.78–0.41 (65%)attempts 21–9goals 1–1
- Mayfield – Toews15:24
xG 0.63–0.51 (55%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0
- Boychuk – Leddy18:37
xG 0.42–0.47 (47%)attempts 12–14goals 0–1
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestSheary – Reinhart – Rodrigues12:16
xG 0.37–0.17 (69%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0
- Pominville – Skinner – Eichel10:14
xG 0.47–0.35 (57%)attempts 13–8goals 2–1
- Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons12:08
xG 0.37–0.25 (59%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0
- Sobotka – Thompson – Smith9:02
xG 0.11–0.60 (16%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestScandella – Ristolainen17:36
xG 0.76–0.70 (52%)attempts 15–16goals 2–1
- McCabe – Pilut14:42
xG 0.21–0.30 (41%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0
- Hunwick – Dahlin15:28
xG 0.56–0.76 (42%)attempts 11–17goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BUF − NYI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).