Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 21, 2019·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Arizona Coyotes 3, Vancouver Canucks 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 58% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ARI0110622011338
VAN117091501232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:47VANBo HorvatAssists: Antoine Roussel, Markus Granlund · Snap, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P3 10:34ARIJakob ChychrunPPAssists: Alex Galchenyuk, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P3 15:45ARILawson CrouseAssists: Josh Archibald, Derek Stepan · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P3 16:57VANAdam GaudetteAssists: Antoine Roussel, Brock Boeser · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:54ARIAlex GalchenyukGWGAssists: Alex Goligoski, Vinnie Hinostroza · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 4:33VANErik Gudbranson: Holding2 min
  2. P1 18:59ARIAlex Goligoski: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 1:11ARINick Cousins: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 11:47ARINiklas Hjalmarsson: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 9:59VANDerrick Pouliot: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ARI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← ARI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Stepan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ARIVAN
38Shots on goal32
2.7Expected goals2.3
66Shot attempts64
30Faceoffs won33
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
16Hits28
13Blocked shots15
4Giveaways8
1Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestStepan – Archibald – Crouse12:56

    xG 0.42–0.13 (76%)attempts 16–8goals 1–0

  2. Cousins – Garland – Keller5:37

    xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Kempe – Hinostroza7:18

    xG 0.62–0.51 (55%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  4. Panik – Weal – Garland2:14

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Chychrun16:05

    xG 0.88–0.31 (74%)attempts 24–14goals 0–0

  2. Connauton – Oesterle13:16

    xG 0.45–0.46 (50%)attempts 15–17goals 0–1

  3. Ekman-Larsson – Oesterle2:25

    xG 0.01–0.07 (14%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSpooner – Boeser – Pettersson11:49

    xG 0.59–0.15 (80%)attempts 17–10goals 0–0

  2. Roussel – Granlund – Gaudette4:54

    xG 0.20–0.00 (98%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Roussel – Granlund – Horvat3:42

    xG 0.23–0.06 (79%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Eriksson – Beagle – Motte3:23

    xG 0.00–0.06 (6%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHutton – Stecher20:42

    xG 0.68–0.33 (68%)attempts 18–19goals 2–0

  2. Gudbranson – Sautner11:31

    xG 0.68–0.68 (50%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1

  3. Biega – Hutton2:01

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.3 xGARI 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANARI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it ARI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #307 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.07 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
ARI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 58% of the time.

VAN winsARI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − ARI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).